<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProgressPolitics &#187; vice</title>
	<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>What do McCain&#8217;s fellow Republicans really think of his Pick of Sarah Palin for Vice president?</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/08/what-do-mccains-fellow-republicans-really-think-of-his-pick-of-sarah-palin-for-vice-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/08/what-do-mccains-fellow-republicans-really-think-of-his-pick-of-sarah-palin-for-vice-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>progress</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[palin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sarah]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following are quotes from McCain&#8217;s fellow republicans with respect to the Arizona senators choosing Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate. Very interesting.
Alaska&#8217;s Republican State Senate President: Palin Not Prepared, Thought Pick Was A Joke. State Senate President Lyda Green said she thought it was a joke when someone called her at 6 a.m. to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following are quotes from McCain&#8217;s fellow republicans with respect to the Arizona senators choosing Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate. Very interesting.</p>
<p><strong>Alaska&#8217;s Republican State Senate President: Palin Not Prepared, Thought Pick Was A Joke.</strong><span> </span>State Senate President Lyda Green said she thought it was a joke when someone called her at 6 a.m. to give her the news.<span>  </span>&#8216;She&#8217;s not prepared to be governor. How can she be prepared to be vice president or president?&#8217; said Green, a Republican from Palin&#8217;s hometown of Wasilla. &#8216;Look at what she&#8217;s done to this state. What would she do to the nation?&#8217;&#8221;<span>  </span>[<a href="http://www.adn.com/news/politics/story/510249.html"><font color="#335c85">Anchorage Daily News</font></a>, 8/29/08]</p>
<p><strong>Alaska&#8217;s Republican House Speaker Has Nothing Positive To Say About Palin&#8217;s Qualifications..</strong><span> </span>&#8220;State House Speaker John Harris, a Republican from Valdez, was astonished at the news. He didn&#8217;t want to get into the issue of her qualifications.<span>  </span>&#8216;She&#8217;s old enough,&#8217; Harris said. &#8216;She&#8217;s a U.S. citizen.&#8217;&#8221;<span>  </span>[<a href="http://www.adn.com/news/politics/story/510249.html"><font color="#335c85">Anchorage Daily News</font></a>, 8/29/08]</p>
<p><strong>Conservative Rick Rydell: Questionable Vetting.</strong><span> </span>Conservative host Rick Rydell said there are some benefits to the state, but it&#8217;s a gamble for McCain to pick an unknown with what he considered &#8216;questionable vetting.&#8217; &#8216;It seems almost like a Hail Mary pass at the end of a football game,&#8217; Rydell said in an interview after his show Friday.<span>  </span>Rydell said McCain has destroyed his argument about Barack Obama&#8217;s lack of experience.&#8221;<span>  </span>[<a href="http://www.adn.com/news/politics/story/510249.html"><font color="#335c85">Anchorage Daily News</font></a>, 8/29/08]</p>
<p><strong>California Republican Delegates Worried About Palin Pick.</strong><span> </span>&#8220;California Republican delegates Karen and Robert Bonadio (father and daughter) said they are worried about McCain&#8217;s pick for VP. They like her story a lot . . .<span>  </span>But the Bonadios heard that Palin and her family are hunters, actually going out into the countryside to shoot wild creatures that weren&#8217;t doing anything to her. That offends the L.A. delegates greatly, and they really don&#8217;t want to hear that different parts of the country may have different cultures and views of such things.<span>  </span>The Bonadios don&#8217;t know that they want such a smalltown person as vice president. And they intend to make that point clear this week if they get another chance to talk with the senator.&#8221;<span>  </span>[<a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/08/rnc-delegate-ca.html"><font color="#335c85">LA Times</font></a>, 8/31/08]</p>
<p style="line-height: normal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: #333333"></span></p>
<p style="line-height: normal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: #333333"></span></p>
<p><strong>St. Louis Republican Delegate Deeply Concerned With Palin Selection.</strong><span> </span>&#8220;Several Republican delegates said they too were shocked by the selection of Ms. <span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">Palin</span></span> and, while they wished her well, were deeply <span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">concerned</span></span> that she did not have the experience in foreign policy or national security to be commander in chief. &#8216;We&#8217;ve been told for the last few months that experience is what matters most in the next White House,&#8217; said John Scates, a delegate from St. Louis. &#8216;But McCain is picking someone whose experience is little to nothing or, at best, unknown.&#8217;&#8221; [New York Times, 8/31/08]<br />
<span style="font-size: 12pt"> </span></p>
<p><span><strong>Conservative Columnist: Palin Pick Near Suicidal.</strong><span> </span></span>&#8220;&#8216;The Palin selection completely undercuts the argument about Obama&#8217;s inexperience and readiness to lead&#8217; wrote syndicated conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer. &#8216;To gratuitously undercut the remarkably successful &#8216;Is he ready to lead&#8217; line of attack seems near suicidal.&#8217;&#8221; [Ottawa Citizen, 8/31/08]</p>
<p><span><strong>Alabama Republican Delegate: Palin Not Qualified.</strong><span> </span></span>&#8220;As they began gathering in Minneapolis-St. Paul for the start of their convention on Monday, some Republican delegates said they were concerned that Ms. Palin did not have the experience in foreign policy or national security to be commander in chief.<span>  </span>&#8216;We&#8217;re in a global war, we&#8217;re in a global economy, so it&#8217;s less than honest if someone says that this woman is qualified to lead America right now,&#8217; said Todd Burkhalter, a Republican delegate from Mobile, Ala.&#8221;<span>  </span>[New York Times, 8/30/08]</p>
<p><span><strong>Republican Operatives Worry About Palin Pick.</strong><span> </span>&#8220;</span>&#8220;&#8216;I want to believe this is a game-changer, but when I close my eyes I see New Orleans in 1988,&#8217; said a dumbstruck Republican operative, recalling the convention where Vice President George H.W. Bush tapped Dan Quayle&#8221; . .<span>  </span>. &#8216;Hell, I don&#8217;t know anything about her,&#8217; a top Republican fund-raiser sputtered. &#8216;She may attract some independent women, but I can&#8217;t think of a state where she can make a difference.&#8217;&#8221; [<a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/republican_race/2008/08/29/2008-08-29_brilliant_move_or_female_quayle.html"><font color="#335c85">New York Daily News</font></a>, 8/29/08]</p>
<p><span><strong>Describe Palin Pick As &#8220;Desperate&#8221; And Contrary to McCain&#8217;s &#8220;Country First&#8221; Slogan.</strong><span> </span>&#8220;</span>Shannen Coffin, a former White House counsel to Dick Cheney, the vice-president, said choosing Palin seemed &#8216;desperate&#8217; and that it would be difficult to attack Barack Obama, the Democratic nominee, on the grounds of inexperience. &#8216;It is hard to imagine Palin playing the same sort of role that modern vice-presidents like Gore, Bush, Cheney or Mondale played,&#8217; he said.<span>  &#8220;&#8230;. [McCain] is one arrogant SOB. McCain is essentially telling the world that he doesn&#8217;t really need a Vice President&#8230;. Rather, the Office would seem poised to return to the &#8216;proverbial warm bucket of p***&#8217; category.  &#8220;</span>Anti-abortion conservative Republicans applauded the choice as daring and modern, but others criticised her lack of foreign policy expertise and inexperience in a national election.<span>  </span>David Frum, President George W. Bush&#8217;s former speech-writer, warned: &#8216;The McCain campaign&#8217;s slogan is &#8216;country first&#8217;. If it were your decision, and you were putting your country first, would you put an untested small-town mayor a heartbeat from the presidency?&#8217;&#8221;<span>  </span>[<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4641397.ece"><font color="#335c85">TimesOnline</font></a>, 8/31/08]<span style="font-size: 12pt; color: #363636; font-family: 'Georgia','sans-serif'"></span></p>
<p><span><strong>Alaskan Republicans Have Reservations About Palin.</strong><span> </span>&#8220;</span>[A] growing chorus of Alaskans expressed reservations. &#8216;She&#8217;s not qualified, she doesn&#8217;t have the judgment, to be next in line to the president of the United States,&#8217; Larry Persily, who until June worked in the governor&#8217;s Washington office as a congressional liaison, said in a phone interview.<span>  </span>A supporter of Palin&#8217;s campaign for governor, Jim Whitaker, the Republican mayor of Fairbanks, also questioned Palin&#8217;s readiness to serve as vice president.<span>  </span>Whitaker said that while he is &#8217;still an avid supporter&#8217; of Palin as governor, he will continue to back Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama.&#8221;<span>  </span>[<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aJgm2T3qgeZU"><font color="#335c85">Bloomberg</font></a>, 9/1/08]</p>
<p><span><strong>Republican Strategist: I&#8217;m Perplexed..</strong><span> </span>&#8220;</span>David Marin, a principal at the Podesta Group and a Republican congressional strategist said, &#8220;I&#8217;m perplexed. Maybe the choice is pure genius. Maybe McCain has energized the base, re-established his maverick credentials, re-emphasized his reform agenda, and added historic new cracks to the odious glass ceiling, all with a single decision. Maybe Palin will amaze us all and be able to stand toe-to-toe with Biden. Maybe she&#8217;ll add some much-needed sizzle.<span>  </span>But I thought the McCain campaign was about experience at a time of national crisis. And I thought he understood the outcome will ultimately rest with independents, with &#8216;post partisans.&#8217; I guess it&#8217;s a good thing most people vote for president, not VP, because, right now at least, this has Bentsen-Quayle written all over it.&#8221;<span>  </span>[<a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=1A9A60A5-18FE-70B2-A84F47EAFC837C6A"><font color="#335c85">Politico</font></a>, 9/1/08]</p>
<p><span><strong>Former McCain Advisor: Palin Pick Suggests Lack of Confidence.</strong><span> </span>&#8220;</span>&#8216;It was certainly a surprising pick,&#8217; says Dan Schnur, who served as McCain&#8217;s communications director during the Arizona senator&#8217;s 2000 presidential campaign. It&#8217;s the sort of pick, he says, that you would expect when a candidate is &#8216;behind 10 or 15 points in the polls.&#8217;<span>  </span>But with McCain and Obama running neck and neck, most analysts would anticipate a safer choice. &#8216;So it seems the senator and his advisers aren&#8217;t as confident&#8217; as they might be, Schnur says.&#8221;<span>  </span>[<a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94113125&amp;ft=1&amp;f=1012"><font color="#335c85">NPR.org</font></a>, 8/29/08]</p>
<p><span><strong>Pat Local Conservative Blogger: McCain&#8217;s Worst Mistake.</strong><span> </span>&#8220;</span>Sherry Whitstine, a local [Alaska] conservative blogger, was dumbfounded by Palin&#8217;s selection, and not in a good way. Palin is &#8217;small potatoes,&#8217; said Whitstine, who is still struggling to come to grips with McCain&#8217;s decision. &#8216;[Trying to make <span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">Palin</span></span>] the VP of our country is probably the worst <span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">mistake</span></span> of [McCain&#8217;s] entire life,&#8217; Whitstine said.&#8221;<span>  </span>[Chicago Tribune, 9/1/08]</p>
<p><strong>National Review senior editor Rick Brookhiser.</strong>&#8220;Either McCain thinks the war on terror isn&#8217;t serious, or he thinks the vice-presidency isn&#8217;t,&#8221; </p>
<p><strong>Former counsel to Dick Cheney Shannen Coffin</strong>&#8220;The choice also says a lot about McCain. First, that he is a bit desperate,&#8221; Coffin writes on the National Review site <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MTA1MTI2ZjJjMzIwYmE2ZGIxNDAzNDk4NDcwZjg4MDg="><font color="#058b7b">The Corner</font></a>. &#8220;Second, that he is one arrogant SOB. McCain is essentially telling the world that he doesn&#8217;t really need a Vice President&#8230;. Rather, the Office would seem poised to return to the &#8216;proverbial warm bucket of p***&#8217; category.&#8221;</p>
<p><span><strong>Pat Buchanan Mocks Palin With Joe Scarborough</strong>.<span> </span>&#8220;</span>On MSNBC on August 29, 2008 (before the announcement), Pat Buchanan had this to say about Sarah Palin:.<span style="font-size: 12pt"><span> </span>&#8220;</span>You mentioned the word <span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">commander</span> </span><span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">in</span> </span><span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">chief</span>.</span> And it is &#8212; it is hard to see Sarah <span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">Palin</span> </span><span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">as</span> </span><span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">commander</span> </span><span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">in</span> </span><span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">chief</span></span> within the next year or something like that. I think that&#8217;s the real risk that just &#8212; this woman, she might be outstanding. She might get women, get conservatives, energize the base. But I think the argument made against her would be that she just is not ready to be <span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">commander</span> </span><span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">in</span> </span><span class="term1"><span style="font-weight: normal">chief,</span></span> and she could be eaten alive in a debate with Joe Biden.&#8221;<span>  </span>Buchanan went on to acknowledge that Obama has done more to validate himself, saying &#8220;No, you are right. He validated himself, Barack Obama, by beating everybody all the &#8212; over 18 months.&#8221;<span>  </span>[MSNBC, 8/29/08; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTbsbeY5k5k"><font color="#335c85">YouTube</font></a>]</p>
<p><span><strong>Karl Rove: Palin &#8220;Risky&#8221; Pick.</strong><span> </span>&#8220;</span>Before the news of her daughter&#8217;s pregnancy broke, Karl Rove told the Maine Republican delegation that Sarah Palin is a &#8220;risky&#8221; choice for vice president.<span>  </span>[<a href="http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/theres_lot_of_talk_about.php"><font color="#335c85">TheAtlantic.com</font></a>, 9/1/08; <a href="http://www.politickerme.com/jessicaalaimo/2471/rove-obamas-inexperienced-bidens-big-blowhard-doofus"><font color="#335c85">PolitickerME.com</font></a>, 9/1/08]</p>
<p><span><strong>Washington Post: Republicans Nervous.</strong><span> </span>&#8220;</span>S]ome Republicans remained nervous about the party&#8217;s ticket, worrying about the potential for more surprises in the days ahead. &#8216;Palin&#8217;s daughter&#8217;s pregnancy is probably much ado about nothing &#8212; I think,&#8217; one GOP strategist said. &#8216;If there&#8217;s more, it will raise questions about the whole vetting process because she&#8217;s such an unknown.&#8217; Another McCain loyalist said he doubts the controversy will last. &#8216;It came out in the vetting, and if that&#8217;s true, then the vetting worked,&#8217; he said. &#8216;If that&#8217;s not true, then I would have concerns.&#8217;&#8221; [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/01/AR2008090103127_2.html"><font color="#335c85">Washington Post</font></a>, 9/2/08]</p>
<p><span><strong>Prominent Republican Writer Says Palin Pick Neither Wise Nor Responsible.</strong><span> </span>&#8220;</span>Former Bush speechwriter, David Frum, said this about Sarah Palin: &#8220;Ms. Palin&#8217;s experience in government makes Barack Obama look like George C. Marshall. She served two terms on the city council of Wasilla, Alaska, population 9,000. She served two terms as mayor. In November, 2006, she was elected governor of the state, a job she has held for a little more than 18 months. She has zero foreign policy experience, and no record on national security issues.<span>  </span>All this would matter less, but for this fact: The day that John McCain announced his selection of Sarah Palin was his birthday. His 72nd birthday. . . If anything were to happen to a President McCain, the destiny of the free world would be placed in the hands of a woman who until recently was a small-town mayor.&#8221;<span>  </span>He concluded by saying, &#8220;Ms. Palin is a bold pick, and probably a shrewd one. It&#8217;s not nearly so clear that she is a responsible pick, or a wise one.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.aei.org/include/pub_print.asp?pubID=28535&amp;url=http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.28535/pub_detail.asp"><font color="#335c85">AEI.org</font></a>, 9/2/08]</p>
<p><span><strong>Veteran Republican: Palin Pick Reckless.</strong><span>  </span>&#8220;</span>Each new fact we learn about Sarah Palin&#8211;her reversal on the bridge to nowhere, her disagreements with McCain on issues from windfall profits to global warming, emerging facts about troopergate&#8211;contribute to the feeling that this whole Palin thing is being made up as we go along. It may be fun to read about, and it sure is fun to cover, but it also supports the judgment of the Palin pick that I first heard from a Republican veteran shortly after the announcement: &#8216;Reckless.&#8217;&#8221;<span>  </span>[<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2199058/"><font color="#335c85">Slate</font></a>, 9/1/08]<span style="font-size: 12pt"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/08/what-do-mccains-fellow-republicans-really-think-of-his-pick-of-sarah-palin-for-vice-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Gov. Sarah Palin just pee on our leg and tell us it&#8217;s raining?</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/04/did-sarah-palin-just-pee-on-our-leg-and-tell-us-its-raining/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/04/did-sarah-palin-just-pee-on-our-leg-and-tell-us-its-raining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Republican Convention]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[palin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alaska]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sarah]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/04/did-sarah-palin-just-pee-on-our-leg-and-tell-us-its-raining/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Governor Sarah Palin gave a speech last night laced with sarcasm and mocking rhetoric directed at Senator Obama and his wife Michelle.  While Sen. Biden&#8217;s speech appealed to the best part of us, Gov. Palin&#8217; speech appealed to the worst part of us.  Still keeping in mind that this race is about John McCain and his judgment because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Governor Sarah Palin gave a speech last night laced with sarcasm and mocking rhetoric directed at Senator Obama and his wife Michelle.  While Sen. Biden&#8217;s speech appealed to the best part of us, Gov. Palin&#8217; speech appealed to the worst part of us.  Still keeping in mind that this race is about John McCain and his judgment because he is the person to whom the buck would stop (one 15-minute VP interview), we feel the need to devote at least one post to Gov. Palin&#8217;s speech.  Palin&#8217;s speech had the Cheney style smugness that is the hallmark of the current administration.  It wasn&#8217;t a surprise when we found out that Dubya&#8217;s speechwriter crafted the speech. One wonders how  she will do on her own without the strategists and speechwriters.  If she is the new light of the right&#8230;..then put her out there.  There are questionable reports that the teleprompter may have broken during Palin&#8217;s speech last night&#8230;.okay, so Palin can actually memorize a speech after practicing for several days.  What skill!  Anyone who thinks that any part of that speech last night was not scripted is either smoking something or thinks the rest of us are smoking something.  During the day yesterday the McCain campaign portrayed Palin as a victim of sexism, yet as the camera panned the auditorium last night  we saw buttons like &#8221; we have the hottest VP&#8221;  and &#8220;hot chick.&#8221;  The hypocrisy is palatable.  Also, Palin did a good job of not mentioning her extremist views regarding abortion (no abortions even in cases of rape or incest), global warming ( not man made), etc..  The Alaskan governor failed to mention that after being in office for less than 20 months she is already the subject of an ethics investigation.  In addition, she failed to mention that she raised taxes as governor, she coveted pork-barrel projects as mayor, she attempted to ban books at the local library, and she believes the war in Iraq is &#8220;a task from God.  Palin also told a number of lies in her speech last night but because she gave a good delivery to the GOP audience the media is spinning it as brilliant. Now it&#8217;s time to look at her speech without the beer goggles.  There were gross mischaracterizations of her own history as well as that of Sen. Obama&#8217;s.  She said that she told Congress &#8220;thanks but no thanks&#8221; to the &#8220;bridge to nowhere&#8221; when she lobbied for and received millions in earmarks ($223 million &#8220;bridge to nowhere&#8221; funds to be exact).  Also, the &#8220;bridge&#8221; led to a town of about 50 residents&#8230;&#8230;.that works out to be about 4.5 million per resident&#8230;..very fiscally responsible with our tax dollars.  Not to mention that she was for the &#8220;bridge to nowhere&#8221; before it became politically unpopular in Alaska and then she was against it.  So tell me, how much do you trust someone who in their first national speech to a national audience looks straight into the camera and tells easily refutable lies.  Brazingly, unapolagetically lied in an effort to dupe the public.  That takes balls.  Do you trust that this person will do anything that she promises?  Isn&#8217;t that exactly what George Bush and Bill Cheney did when selling the war in Iraq, etc..  Palin described how she had actual responsibilities as mayor and mocked Sen. Obama&#8217;s experience as a community organizer even though as a community organizer Sen. Obama was able to get laid off steel workers jobs that had been shipped overseas among his many other accomplishments during that time.  Palin exact quote was the following:  </p>
<blockquote><p>Before I became governor of the great state of Alaska, I was mayor of my hometown. And since our opponents in this presidential election seem to look down on that experience, let me explain to them what the job involves. I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a ‘community organizer,’ except that you have actual responsibilities.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes Gov. Palin, as a &#8220;small-town&#8221; mayor you did have responsibilities.  You had the responsibility not to leave your town that boasted a surplus as you entered office but a $20 million deficit as you left.  This is a town with a $6 million dollar budget and 53 employees.  I guess Palin&#8217;s motto is spend, spend, spend.  Like the current Bush, Palin&#8217;s overconfidence overshadows her incompetence.</p>
<p>Palin also asserted:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There is much to like and admire about our opponent. But listening to him speak, it&#8217;s easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform _ not even in the state senate.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Well Gov. Palin, Sen. Obama worked with Republican Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana &#8221;to pass legislation that expanded efforts to intercept illegal shipments of weapons of mass destruction and to help destroy conventional weapons stockpiles. The legislation became law last year.&#8221;  Sen. Obama also successfully co-sponsored major ethics reform legislation.  I will not even go into Sen. Biden&#8217;s record.   Exactly what legislation have you written&#8230;&#8230;you didn&#8217;t mention that last night.</p>
<p>Further, is the McCain/Palin ticket really taunting itself as change when it is the party currently in office and is responsible for the majority of the problems that our country is mired in. Why are you telling us how bad the opponent is without telling us what your plan is?  There was nothing about how you will be able to improve the lives of the average American.</p>
<p>Sarcasm is not an effective negotiating tool when you&#8217;re facing a crisis in Georgia or the Middle East.  Sarcasm is not an effective tool in a sinking economy.  In other words, lots of zingers mixed with sarcasm does not a competent leader make.  Oh&#8230;by the way&#8230;.Sen. Palin&#8230;.you received 1500 votes to become mayor of Wasilla, Sen Biden received almost 80,000 votes during the primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/04/did-sarah-palin-just-pee-on-our-leg-and-tell-us-its-raining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>23 things John McCain didn&#8217;t know about Sarah Palin before choosing her as VP</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/02/20-things-john-mccain-didnt-know-about-sarah-palin-before-choosing-her-as-vp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/02/20-things-john-mccain-didnt-know-about-sarah-palin-before-choosing-her-as-vp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[palin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sarah]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/02/20-things-john-mccain-didnt-know-about-sarah-palin-before-choosing-her-as-vp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be clear, this is less about Sarah Palin and all about the judgment of Sen. John McCain.  If McCain had exercised the kind of judgment and conducted the type of thorough investigation befitting a choice of individual for the second most powerful position in the free world, perhaps we would not be having this discussion.   The media has uncovered quite a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, this is less about Sarah Palin and all about the judgment of Sen. John McCain.  If McCain had exercised the kind of judgment and conducted the type of thorough investigation befitting a choice of individual for the second most powerful position in the free world, perhaps we would not be having this discussion.   The media has uncovered quite a bit of troubling information about Gov. Palin in the last couple of days simply by conducting a google search.  Judging from the McCain campaign responses, they did not bother to conduct such a search.  When requesting a response from the McCain campaign about the various facts below, McCain surrogates appear befuddled and confused.   As a matter of fact, the McCain campaign is currently engaged in a post-selection vetting process.  Though we are sure that Gov. Palin is a good person, Sen. McCain has demonstrated the kind of rash, reckless, shoot first ask questions last, shoot&#8230;ready&#8230;aim, invade Iraq then find non-existent WMAs, rush to judgment that is the hallmark of the current Bush administration.  This is the first and most important presidential decision that McCain will make as a candidate for the top spot.  The decision of who will serve in the second most powerful position in the world. How such a decision is made is indicative of a candidate&#8217;s style of governing.  After the revelation of the following facts, McCain may have failed his first presidential task.  It appears as if gambler McCain picked up the dice, blew on them, and rolled.  Unfortunately for him, it appears that he may have rolled craps.  The following is information McCain could have easily learned had he bothered to properly vet Gov. Palin.</p>
<ol>
<li>Palin is linked to <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/members-of-frin.html" title="a member of the Alaskan secessionist party">the Alaskan Secessionist party</a>.   Sarah Palin is linked to and her husband was a member of the Alaska Independence Party.  Palin reportedly attended the AIP convention in 1994.  AIP&#8217;s motto is &#8220;Alaska First.&#8221;  Also, Gov. Palin sent a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwvPNXYrIyI" title="video message">video message </a>to the 2008 AIP convention telling the group &#8220;to keep up the good work.&#8221;  The group&#8217;s goal is to have a vote on Alaska&#8217;s state status on the question of whether the state should secede from the United States.</li>
<li>Palin was mayor of the town of Wasilla, population at the time, around 5000, less than the population of most high schools in the U.S.</li>
<li>Palin was <a target="_blank" href="http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=AS&amp;p_theme=as&amp;p_action=search&amp;p_maxdocs=200&amp;p_topdoc=1&amp;p_text_direct-0=0F79408854D0C20B&amp;p_field_direct-0=document_id&amp;p_perpage=10&amp;p_sort=YMD_date:D&amp;s_trackval=GooglePM" title="almost recalled as mayor">almost recalled as mayor </a>because of an alleged abuse of power scandal</li>
<li>Palin reportedly, as mayor, left the small town of Wasilla $22 million dollars in debt</li>
<li>Palin directed fundraising for indicted <a target="_blank" href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/01/palin_was_a_director_of_embatt.html" title="Ted Stevens 527 group">Ted Stevens 527 group</a> (&#8221;bridge to nowhere&#8221; Senator)</li>
<li>Palin was <a target="_blank" href="http://www.adn.com/sarahpalin/story/511471.html" title="for the ">for the &#8220;bridge to nowhere&#8221;</a> before she was against it</li>
<li>Palin currently being investigated in another abuse of power <a target="_blank" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/01/palin-trooper-scandal-cou_n_122903.html" title="abuse of power scandal involving a state trooper">scandal involving a state trooper</a></li>
<li>Palin called<a target="_blank" href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/31/palin-iraq-is-a-war-for-oil/" title="Iraq a war for oil"> Iraq a war for oil </a>(opposite of McCain&#8217;s position)</li>
<li>Palin admits that she has <a target="_blank" href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/08/palin-surge-wha.html" title="not really focused on Iraq">&#8220;not really focused on Iraq&#8221;&#8230;</a>huh?</li>
<li>Palin admits on <em>Larry King</em> that she is not sure what a Vice President does</li>
<li>According to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/31/alaska-national-guard-gen_n_122860.html" title="Alaskan National Guard General">Alaskan National Guard General:</a>  Palin played no role in national defense&#8230;.as governor of Alaska, she is not even consulted.</li>
<li>McCain only recently  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/01/mccain-campaign-sends-a-d_n_123063.html" title="sent a dozen communications operatives and lawyers to Alaska">sent a dozen communications operatives and lawyers to Alaska</a> to further investigate Palin</li>
<li>Even though the McCain campaign is attempting to position Palin as anti-earmark, Palin has lobied for and received millions in earmarks as governor and mayor.</li>
<li>The state of Alaska has <a target="_blank" href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-na-earmarks1-2008sep01,0,6108885.story" title="requested 31 earmarks totaling 197.8 million from next year's federal budget">requested 31 earmarks totaling 197.8 million from next year&#8217;s federal budget</a>&#8230;.this is pivotal considering McCain&#8217;s promise to make all politicians who request earmarks famous by vetoing all earmarks that cross his desk if he were to become president.  The reformer label the McCain campaign is pushing Palin as doesn&#8217;t fit.</li>
<li>Palin&#8217;s <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/republican_race/2008/08/30/2008-08-30_sarah_palins_motherinlaw_uncertain_about.html" title="mother-in-law may vote for Sen. Barack Obama">mother-in-law may vote for Sen. Barack Obama </a>and is not sure what Palin brings to the ticket other than she is a woman and a conservative.</li>
<li>That Palins <a target="_blank" href="http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/08/29/what-is-mccain-thinking-one-alaskans-perspective/" title="approval rating">approval rating </a>is not the touted 80% but 67% and sinking.</li>
<li>&#8220;[A] number of leading [Alaskan] Republican officeholders in the state who <a target="_blank" href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/scorecard/0808/Alaska_Republicans_offer_frosty_reaction_to_Palin_pick.html?showall" title="mocked Palin's qualifications">mocked Palin&#8217;s qualifications</a>. &#8220;She&#8217;s not prepared to be governor. How can she be prepared to be vice president or president?&#8221; said Lyda Green, the president of the State Senate, a Republican from Palin&#8217;s hometown of Wasilla. &#8220;Look at what she&#8217;s done to this state. What would she do to the nation?&#8221;</li>
<li>Alaska top Republican, John Harris, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/scorecard/0808/Alaska_Republicans_offer_frosty_reaction_to_Palin_pick.html?showall" title="the speaker of the House">the speaker of the House</a>, when asked about her qualifications for Veep, replied with this: &#8220;She&#8217;s old enough. She&#8217;s a U.S. citizen.&#8221;</li>
<li><em>Daily News-Miner</em>in Fairbanks Alaska:   Most people would acknowledge that, regardless of her charm and good intentions, Palin is not ready for the top job. McCain seems to have put his political interests ahead of the nation&#8217;s when he created the possibility that she might fill it.</li>
<li>Editorial in the <em>Anchorage Daily News</em>:  Palin joins the ticket with one huge weakness: She&#8217;s a total beginner on national and international issues.</li>
<li>Palin only <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/30/us/politics/30veep.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin" title="obtained a passport">obtained a passport one year </a>ago.</li>
<li>Palin has <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/30/us/politics/30veep.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin" title="never traveled to Russia">never traveled to Russia</a> despite its proximity to Alaska</li>
<li>Regarding the &#8220;bridge to nowhere&#8221; and earmarks, in June Palin gave a speech to the Wasilla Assembly of God, Ms. Palin proclaimed that it is &#8221;God’s will&#8221; that the federal government contribute to a $30 billion gas pipeline she wants built in Alaska.</li>
</ol>
<p>Judgment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/02/20-things-john-mccain-didnt-know-about-sarah-palin-before-choosing-her-as-vp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sen. McCain Veep Choice&#8230;&#8230;Maverick or Erratic?</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/01/sen-mccain-veep-choiceerratic-or-maverick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/01/sen-mccain-veep-choiceerratic-or-maverick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[palin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[AIP]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alaska]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Alaskan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Independence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[party]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sarah]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/01/sen-mccain-veep-choiceerratic-or-maverick/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator John McCain has chosen and unknown, untested, trophy candidate as his vice presidential nominee.  Does anyone really think that Gov. Sarah Palin really is prepared to lead this county in the event of of a national security emergency.  One out of three vice presidents has had to act as president during their tenure.  For those who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator John McCain has chosen and unknown, untested, trophy candidate as his vice presidential nominee.  Does anyone really think that Gov. Sarah Palin really is prepared to lead this county in the event of of a national security emergency.  One out of three vice presidents has had to act as president during their tenure.  For those who think that this will not happen in light of McCain&#8217;s status as a 72 year-old, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-illness29-2008jul29,0,4789972.story" title="four-time cancer survivor">four-time cancer survivor</a>, they are deluding themselves. </p>
<p>For those of you who are comparing Obama to Palin, Sen. Obama has a track record of being right on several of the most important foreign policy decision of this decade.  The Illinois senator has proven that he has the judgment and temperament to be president.  First, Sen. Obama spoke out against the Iraq War, Sen. Obama pushed for a timetable for Iraq (we now have a timetable), Sen. Obama pushed to keep Pakistan in the dark as to our strategy for taking out key members of Al Queda on the Pakistan/Afghanistan border (after doing which we took out a key member of Al Qaeda), Sen. Obama said we should talk to our enemies.  President Bush spoke with North Korea, after Obama had been saying to do so for a year, afterwards North Korea agrees to begin dismanteling its nukes. The Bush administration is now talking to Iran. Not to mention that Sen. Obama has run a 50-state campaign against a formidable candidate and won.  Lastly, Sen. Obama proved himself to the American people, and as a result, the AMERICAN people in their vote of confidence, voted him into his current position as the democratic nominee.  Sen. McCain  put Palin in her position and he hasn&#8217;t proven to the American people that we can trust his judgment on anything, let alone choosing a neophyte to become a heartbeat away from the presidency.  This is a irrational and desperate decision that was made by McCain after meeting with the Alaskan governor once&#8230;.ONCE, before making her the offer to become his running mate.  </p>
<p>Scary Fact: Governor Palin was asked the following question in 2006 about the Pledge of Allegiance:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Q:</strong> Are you offended by the phrase &#8220;Under God&#8221; in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?</p>
<p><strong>PALIN:</strong> Not on your life. <strong>If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me</strong> and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance</p></blockquote>
<p>Slight problem, the Pledge of Allegience was not written until 1892, 56 years after the death of the last founding father.  Thus the founding fathers never knew of or said the Pledge of Allegiance.  The Pledge of Allegiance was not made the official Pledge until 1942, six years after Sen. John McCain was born.  Further, Palin was a member of the Alaskan Independence Party.  The AIP has since the 1970s been pushing for a legal vote for Alaskans to decide whether or not residents of the 49th state can SECEDE from the United States.  Are you kidding me?  The motto of AIP is instead of &#8220;Country First,&#8221; is &#8220;Alaskans First, Alaskans Always.&#8221;  So she does not know the history of the U.S. and was a member of a group that does not want Alaska to be part of the United States.  Do you think that the McCain campaign could have found out this information if they had bothered to properly vet Palin before choosing her as the VP candidate?  Judgment.  This is the person to whom Sen. McCain would like to entrust the safety and security of the American people. </p>
<p>Apparently, McCain also does not have confidence in the abilities of his running mate because the campaign has relegated her to fund raising for down ticket candidates.  The <a target="_blank" href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5700022&amp;page=1" title="McCain campaign said">McCain campaign said</a> that 80% of Palin&#8217;s time will be spent fundraising for donations that the McCain campaign cannot spend after today because the Arizona senator opted for $87 million in public financing.  If Palin is such a great choice and has energized the republican base, why not put her out on the trail as much as possible in order to secure votes?  Why&#8230;because Palin is a trophy candidate.</p>
<p>The McCain campaign sites as Palin&#8217;s foreign policy experience, the fact that she has a son going to Iraq and the fact that Alaska is close to Russia!  Are you kidding me!!!  McCain&#8217;s veep choice decision comes off as rash and erratic.  How else do you explain risking the security of the country in the hands of a governor of a state that boast a population of 685,000?  San Jose, California has a larger population than the whole state of Alaska.  Does that mean that the mayor of San Jose is ready to be president?  Just the city of Chicago is four times the size of the state of Alaska. As for her mayoral experience of presiding over Wasilla, population at the time, about 5000, there are high schools that have more students than Wasilla has residents.  There are a significant number of republican female governors and senators who are at least qualified and many significantly more qualified than Palin.  There are republican female political figures who would have been much more sensible and practical choices for McCain if the Arizona senator had put country first as he claims he will always do.  This is not a &#8220;maverick&#8221; decision, it is an arbitrary and erratic one, made for obvious political reasons. </p>
<p>Choosing their running mate is the first presidential decision that each of these candidates had to make. We the voters were able to witness the decision making process of the candidates.  Do they take the time to think through the implications of the decision to the country?  Do they think that if something happens to me, I trust this person to lead the country? Or, do they think, I want to win regardless?  Or, I choose this person because she looks good on the ticket (shock value), regardless of whether she is capable of leading the country?  Is the vice president decision a reasoned decision or a reckless and impulsive one solely for political gains?  You decide.  Another interesting tidbit,  the McCain campain has only as recent as this week sent attorneys to Alaska to more deeply vet Governor Palin.  Shouldn&#8217;t this have been done before choosing Gov. Palin for the second most powerful job in the free world.  Judgment.   Sen. Obama took the time and effort to put all of the potential veeps through a vigorous vetting process.  Sen. McCain met with Palin once&#8230;..once for 15 minutes, and is only now, after announcing his choice, is deeply vetting the Alaskan governor.  There is a difference between maverick and reckless.  Choosing a neophyte running mate based on one 15 minute meeting leans more towards reckless than maverick. </p>
<p>This is characteristic of McCain&#8217;s methodology when it comes to making decisions. In the Naval Academy, McCain has said that he came very close to flunking out and ended up barely graduating fifth from the bottom of his class, 894 out of 899.   Many of McCain&#8217;s long time friends have said of the Arizona senator &#8220;if you didn&#8217;t want to live on the edge, then don&#8217;t hang around with John McCain.&#8221;  Living on the edge is one of McCain&#8217;s trademarks, boasting actors such as Marlon Brando and James Dean as his heroes.  It&#8217;s very interesting how reminiscent his current attitude is in comparison to his attitude as a young adult.  Sen. McCain has himself revealed that during his aviator training that he chose recreational reading &#8220;at the expense of learning my flight procedures which I probably should have given a higher priority to&#8221; and could not remember how to eject after his plane crashed.  Such antics resulted in a couple of near death experiences for McCain.  Okay, so instead of learning the rules and mechanics of flying a plane in flight school he decided to get in the plane and wing it?   Is this really the safe choice for America in terms of its Commander-in-Chief?  Are Americans actually comfortable with someone who is so easily willing to play chicken when it comes to life and death.  Some may define this as a maverick quality&#8230;..this writer defines it as unnecessary risk taking and reckless behavior.  So for those of you who are conned into buying the maverick meme being pandered by the McCain campaign and the main stream media,  I say that this is an erratic, impulsive, and irresponsible decision by someone who proclaims to put country first.</p>
<p>Whose judgment do you trust? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/01/sen-mccain-veep-choiceerratic-or-maverick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking:   Chooses Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin as Running mate</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/29/breaking-chooses-alaskan-governor-sarah-palin-as-vp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/29/breaking-chooses-alaskan-governor-sarah-palin-as-vp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>progress</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alaska]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[governor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[palin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sarah]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/29/breaking-chooses-alaskan-governor-sarah-palin-as-vp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The McCain campaign excluded several names this morning sending the pundits speculative minds in a tizzy.  Alaskan governor Sarah Palin is a staunch conservative.  It appears as if the McCain decided to roll the dice on this pick. Sarah Palin is a 44 year old first term governor from Alaska and a rookie on the national [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The McCain campaign excluded several names this morning sending the pundits speculative minds in a tizzy.  Alaskan governor Sarah Palin is a staunch conservative.  It appears as if the McCain decided to roll the dice on this pick. Sarah Palin is a 44 year old first term governor from Alaska and a rookie on the national stage.   She is pro-life and catholic.  The question is can this woman be president of the United States.   Sen. McCain is 72 years old today. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/29/breaking-chooses-alaskan-governor-sarah-palin-as-vp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC: Secret Service dispatched To Sen. Joseph Biden&#8230;..(update) it&#8217;s official, Biden wins the veep Gold</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/22/abc-secret-service-dispatched-to-sen-joseph-bidenits-almost-official/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/22/abc-secret-service-dispatched-to-sen-joseph-bidenits-almost-official/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 04:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>progress</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Biden]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[joseph]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[presidential]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[veep]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/22/abc-secret-service-dispatched-to-sen-joseph-bidenits-almost-official/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s official.  ObamaBiden 2008.  After ABC news reported that the Secret Service had been dispatched to Sen. Biden last night, it was confirmed by sources connected to the Obama campaign that the Delaware senator is the pick. The official text was sent out at 3:05am.  Obama has told sources that he made his choice while on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left"><a href="http://progresspolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/splash_slp_biden.jpg" title="splash_slp_biden.jpg"><img src="http://progresspolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/splash_slp_biden.jpg" alt="splash_slp_biden.jpg" /></a>It&#8217;s official.  ObamaBiden 2008.  After ABC news reported that the Secret Service had been dispatched to Sen. Biden last night, it was confirmed by sources connected to the Obama campaign that the Delaware senator is the pick. The official text was sent out at 3:05am.  Obama has told sources that he made his choice while on vacation in Hawaii.  Sen. Biden is a roman catholic born in Scranton, Pennsylvania who rides the Amtrak to work everyday from Delaware.  Biden is reported to be the &#8220;poorest&#8221; senator on capitol hill earning about $300, 000 annually.  The Delaware senator will be an asset to Obama in reaching out to the working class voters.   By senate standards, Biden is working class.  Biden serves as Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and served as a Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee in the past.  Biden clearly has the foreign relations gravitas that compliments the ticket well.  Sen. Biden will appear with Sen. Obama on Saturday in Springfield, Illinois.  The next question will be if Sen. Biden will run for his Delaware senate seat while running as VP.  My guess is yes.</p>
<blockquote><p>The United States Secret Service has dispatched a protective detail to assume the immediate protection of Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., a source tells ABC News, indicating in all likelihood that Biden has been officially notified that Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, has selected him to be his running mate.</p>
<p>Sources also tell ABC News that two others said to be finalists for the position of Obama&#8217;s running mate &#8212; Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., and Virginia Gov Tim Kaine &#8212; have been told they have not been selected to be Obama&#8217;s running mate.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/22/abc-secret-service-dispatched-to-sen-joseph-bidenits-almost-official/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney McCain&#8217;s VP&#8230;.we told you so</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/22/romney-mccains-vpwe-told-you-so/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/22/romney-mccains-vpwe-told-you-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/22/romney-mccains-vpwe-told-you-so/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of unnamed sources close to Sen. John McCain say that he has settled for Mitt Romney as his VP according to Mark Halperin at Time.  
My guess is that the McCain campaign is releasing this information now because it is trying to change the subject from the fact that the Arizona senator is out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of unnamed sources close to Sen. John McCain say that he has settled for Mitt Romney as his VP according to <a target="_blank" href="http://thepage.time.com/" title="Mark Halperin">Mark Halperin </a>at Time.  </p>
<p>My guess is that the McCain campaign is releasing this information now because it is trying to change the subject from the fact that the Arizona senator is out of touch.   So out of touch that he can&#8217;t keep track of the number of houses that he owns and so out of touch that a $3 million dollar income equals middle class. McCains world&#8230;party time&#8230;Excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/22/romney-mccains-vpwe-told-you-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Update)Gen. Wesley Clark&#8217;s name heats up the chattering class as Obama&#8217;s VP choice</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/11/gen-wesley-clarks-name-heats-up-the-blogosphere-as-obamas-vp-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/11/gen-wesley-clarks-name-heats-up-the-blogosphere-as-obamas-vp-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[clark]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wesley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/11/gen-wesley-clarks-name-heats-up-the-blogosphere-as-obamas-vp-choice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gen. Wesley Clark is the name being chatted about by a few members of the chattering class as Obama&#8217;s veep choice.  Apparently, the theme for Wednesday, Aug. 27, the night the vice presidential choice will speak, is being promoted as &#8220;Securing America&#8217;s Future.&#8221;  The coincidence is that it also happens to be the name of Gen. Wesley Clark&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gen. Wesley Clark is the name being chatted about by a few members of the chattering class as Obama&#8217;s veep choice.  Apparently, the theme for Wednesday, Aug. 27, the night the vice presidential choice will speak, is being promoted as &#8220;Securing America&#8217;s Future.&#8221;  The coincidence is that it also happens to be the name of Gen. Wesley Clark&#8217;s political action committee.  Though the website for Clark&#8217;s PAC is <a href="http://www.securingamerica.com/">www.securingamerica.com</a>, the FEC filing list the <a target="_blank" href="http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/?_08+C00398602" title="the full name">the full name</a> which just happens to be the exact same name as Wednesday night&#8217;s theme.  Hmmm&#8230;curiouser and curiouser</p>
<p>When asked about the coinkydink, a Clark campaign official started laughing hysterically saying that &#8220;it&#8217;s just because his PAC was named so well!&#8221;  Hmmm&#8230;.a bit of an overreaction considering. Perhaps politicians should leave all the over acting to the waiters and waitresses in Hollywood.</p>
<p>FYI:  The theme for Thursday night, Aug. 28th, and the night that Sen. Obama is speaking is &#8220;Change You Can Believe In.&#8221;  Hmmm</p>
<p>UPDATE:  Looks like Gen. Clark has decided to raise his media profile a bit more all of a sudden.  See this letter posted today on his SecureAmerica website.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Not Going Away</strong> </p>
<p>A little over a month ago, following my appearance on <em>Face the Nation</em>, the right wing freak machine took me out of context, attacked me, and just wanted me to &#8220;hit the road.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m here to tell you: I&#8217;m not going away.</p>
<p>We simply have too much to do in these final three months. We have to elect Barack Obama the next president of the United States. And we have to give him a working majority in Congress. So let&#8217;s give the right wing what they asked for. I&#8217;m ready to &#8220;hit the road&#8221; and help Democrats across the country!</p>
<p>Contribute to WesPAC&#8217;s &#8220;Hit The Road Fund!&#8221; Help us raise $25,000 by this Friday.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="https://secure.ga4.org/01/wespac">http://securingamerica.com/HitTheRoad</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m committed to doing everything I can to help Democrats win this November. I&#8217;ve opened up my schedule and am ready to hit the campaign trail across the country. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m traveling across the country over the coming weeks.</p>
<p><strong>I can only do this if WesPAC has the financial resources to keep me on the road these final three months.</strong> That&#8217;s why we started the &#8220;Hit The Road Fund.&#8221; I need your help to make sure I can stay on the campaign trail to help folks like Charlie Brown (CA-4), Eric Massa (NY-29), and Bob Tuke (TN-Sen).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve set a goal of raising $25,000 by this Friday. Make a contribution to our &#8220;Hit The Road Fund&#8221; today!</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="https://secure.ga4.org/01/wespac">http://securingamerica.com/HitTheRoad</a></p>
<p>When people hit you, you have to hit back. I won&#8217;t back away from a fight, and over the years we&#8217;ve gotten to know each other, I know you won&#8217;t either. <strong>Please contribute to our &#8220;Hit The Road Fund&#8221; today!</strong></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="https://secure.ga4.org/01/wespac">http://securingamerica.com/HitTheRoad</a></p>
<p>Electing the right people this November will be critical to securing America&#8217;s future. Thank you for your support.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Wes Clark</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Observation:</strong>  The perfect person to call McCain on his &#8220;I know how to win wars&#8221; bull crap, and who has the military gravitas and background to pull it off.  Not to mention that he was an avid Clinton supporter and Pres. Clinton just happens to be speaking on the same night as the vice presidential candidate (perhaps introducing Gen. Clark). Further, why would you have a veteran theme on the vice president&#8217;s night, if the veep choice is not a veteran? If he isn&#8217;t a veteran, wouldn&#8217;t he/she lack credibility?  Because John Kerry and Republican Chuck Hagel are the only other veterans in contention and they are both out of the question (for obvious reasons), the only realistic and obvious choice would be Clark.</p>
<p>Again&#8230;&#8230;hmmm&#8230;and&#8230;hmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/11/gen-wesley-clarks-name-heats-up-the-blogosphere-as-obamas-vp-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC left out Of Presidential debates (schedule)</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/05/abc-left-out-of-presidential-debates-schedule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/05/abc-left-out-of-presidential-debates-schedule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>progress</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[schedule]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/05/abc-left-out-of-presidential-debates-schedule/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The campaigns released the presidential and vice presidential debates schedule today and guess which network was noticeably absent&#8230;.sucks for you ABC.  PBS will host the vice presidential and a single presidential debate.  NBC and CBS will moderate the last two presidential debates.
ABC&#8217;s absence may be a result of its democratic primary debate hosting gig that many perceived as a &#8220;gotcha&#8221; style debate  sans substantive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The campaigns released the presidential and vice presidential debates schedule today and guess which network was noticeably absent&#8230;.sucks for you ABC.  PBS will host the vice presidential and a single presidential debate.  NBC and CBS will moderate the last two presidential debates.</p>
<p>ABC&#8217;s absence may be a result of its democratic primary debate hosting gig that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/16/abc-hosts-heckled-after-d_n_97124.html" title="many perceived as a gotcha style debate">many perceived as a &#8220;gotcha&#8221; style debate </a> sans substantive issues.  That ABC primary debate was hosted by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos.</p>
<p>Schedule:</p>
<p><strong>Presidential Debates</strong></p>
<p>Jim Lehrer, Sept. 26, at the University of Mississippi @9pm EST  (foreign policy debate)<br />
Tom Brokaw, Oct. 7, in Nashville at Belmont University @9pm EST   (townhall meeting, questions from the audience)<br />
Bob Schieffer, Oct. 15, at Hofstra University @9pm EST  (domestic policy debate)</p>
<p><strong>Vice Presidential Debate</strong><br />
Gwen Ifill, Oct. 2, at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri @9pm  (domestic and foreign policy)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/05/abc-left-out-of-presidential-debates-schedule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update:Obama will probably Announce his VP Wednesday&#8230;..and the winner is</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/05/obama-will-probably-announce-his-vp-wednesdayand-the-winner-is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/05/obama-will-probably-announce-his-vp-wednesdayand-the-winner-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bayh]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[decision]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[evan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/05/obama-will-probably-announce-his-vp-wednesdayand-the-winner-is/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t ask us how we know but ProgressPolitics has a strong suspicion that Sen. Obama will be announcing his Veep selection on Wednesday.  There are quite a few coinkydinks occuring that gives this site pause.   Now lets get to the who, drumroll please&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..and the winner of the Veepstakes is&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana.  There are too many coincidences with respect to this particular [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t ask us how we know but ProgressPolitics has a strong suspicion that Sen. Obama will be announcing his Veep selection on Wednesday.  There are quite a few coinkydinks occuring that gives this site pause.   Now lets get to the who, drumroll please&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..and the winner of the Veepstakes is&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana.  There are too many coincidences with respect to this particular senator which we will not go into now.  But he is a great choice given his status as a non Washington insider and his close association with the now dismantled Clinton campaign.  This is merely a suspicion, but it&#8217;s based on facts that will be revealed if the announcement takes place tomorrow.  We could be completely off track but we may not be. If we are right&#8230;.nice choice.</p>
<p>Update:  We may have been incorrect about the announcement date but stand by the veep choice.  Looks like the decison will not be announced until after Sen: Obama returns from vacation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/08/05/obama-will-probably-announce-his-vp-wednesdayand-the-winner-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia Governor Tim Kaine FINALIST on Obama&#8217;s VP list!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/07/28/virginia-governor-tim-kaine-finalist-on-obamas-vp-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/07/28/virginia-governor-tim-kaine-finalist-on-obamas-vp-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[finalist]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kaine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[shortlist]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tiim]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/07/28/virginia-governor-tim-kaine-finalist-on-obamas-vp-list/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Soon after Sen. Brack Obama&#8217;s sit-down with Tom Brokaw on Meet the Press last Sunday, speculation about potential veep&#8217;s has been running rampant throughout the punditry class.  Sen. Obama said that the characteristics that he is looking for in a vice president is someone who will work hard and will be a change agent ready to shake-up Washington.  The senator went on to say, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soon after Sen. Brack Obama&#8217;s sit-down with Tom Brokaw on <em>Meet the Press</em> last Sunday, speculation about potential veep&#8217;s has been running rampant throughout the punditry class.  Sen. Obama said that the characteristics that he is looking for in a vice president is someone who will work hard and will be a change agent ready to shake-up Washington.  The senator went on to say, &#8220;I&#8217;m going to want somebody with independence — who&#8217;s willing to tell me where he thinks, or she thinks, I&#8217;m wrong,&#8221; he said. &#8220;And I&#8217;m going to want somebody who shares a vision of the country: where we need to go — that we&#8217;ve got to fundamentally change not only our policies, but how politics work, how business is done in Washington.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tim Kaine seems to fit the bill.  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0708/12115.html" title="Politico reports:">Politico reports:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>As <a href="http://search.politico.com/results.cfm?subject=Barack+Obama" title="Barack Obama">Senator Barack Obama</a> turns to the choice of his running mate, Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine has emerged as one of the campaign’s potential finalists, sources familiar with conversations in Richmond and in Chicago said.</p>
<p>Kaine, an early Obama supporter whose biography nicely dovetails with the Illinois senator’s, &#8220;ranks very, very high on the short list,&#8221; said a source who has spoken recently to senior Obama aides about Kaine.</p>
<p>Kaine &#8220;is getting a critical examination,&#8221; the source said.</p>
<p>The 50-year-old Virginia governor is among a handful of logical, and much-discussed, choices to join Obama on the campaign trail. Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, former Georgia Sen. Sam Nunn and Delaware Senator Joe Biden are among others frequently mentioned.</p></blockquote>
<p>This writer thinks that Kaine would be a great pick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/07/28/virginia-governor-tim-kaine-finalist-on-obamas-vp-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsflash, Webb NO longer VP prospect&#8230;.duh</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/07/08/newsflash-webb-no-longer-vp-prospectduh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/07/08/newsflash-webb-no-longer-vp-prospectduh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>progress</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consideration]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jim]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[official]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Webb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/07/08/newsflash-webb-no-longer-vp-prospectduh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Webb allegedly took himself out of consideration for the vice presidential spot of Barack Obama&#8217;s presidential candidacy.  In this writer&#8217;s opinion, which is total speculation, I don&#8217;t think that Webb was seriously being considered because of the series of hot buttons that plagued his senate run in 2006.  If it had not been for George Allen&#8217;s &#8220;mucaca&#8221; moment and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Webb allegedly took himself out of consideration for the vice presidential spot of Barack Obama&#8217;s presidential candidacy.  In this writer&#8217;s opinion, which is total speculation, I don&#8217;t think that Webb was seriously being considered because of the series of hot buttons that plagued his senate run in 2006.  If it had not been for George Allen&#8217;s &#8220;mucaca&#8221; moment and youtube I am not sure the Jim Webb would be senator today.  There is the women in the military comment, the affirmative action and confederate flag comments and situation.  These are deal breakers for some folks.  Hillary&#8217;s women would not have been happy with a Jim Webb in Obama&#8217;s veep slot.  And if the slogan &#8220;stop the drama, vote for Obama&#8221; holds true, Jim Webb brings way too much unnecessary drama.  The GOP attack machine would have a field day.  This move seems to be a face-saving move by Webb because the main stream media has been talking him up so much.  Good move.  Okay, so the veepstakes is narrowed a little further, Wesley Clark is out, Sam Nunn is out , and now Jim Webb is out&#8230;&#8230;Al Gore anyone?</p>
<p><em>Senator Jim Webb&#8217;s Official Comment</em> </p>
<p>Last week I communicated to Senator Obama and his presidential campaign my firm intention to remain in the United States Senate, where I believe I am best equipped to serve the people of Virginia and this country. Under no circumstances will I be a candidate for Vice President.&#8221;A year and a half ago, the people of Virginia honored me with election to the U.S. Senate. I entered elective politics because of my commitment to strengthen America&#8217;s national security posture, to promote economic fairness, and to increase government accountability. I have worked hard to deliver upon that commitment, and I am convinced that my efforts and talents toward those ends are best served in the Senate.</p>
<p>&#8220;In this regard, the bipartisan legislative template we were able to put into effect through 18 months of work in order to enact the new, landmark GI Bill will serve as a prototype for my future endeavors in government. This process, wherein we brought 58 Senators from both parties to the table as co-sponsors, along with more than 300 members of the House, gives me renewed confidence that the Congress can indeed work effectively across party lines and address the concerns of our citizens.</p>
<p>&#8220;At this time I am also renewing my commitment to work hard to make sure that Senator Obama wins both Virginia and the presidency this November. He is a man who speaks eloquently about our national goals and calls for the practical solutions that must be put into place to obtain them. I will proudly campaign for him.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/07/08/newsflash-webb-no-longer-vp-prospectduh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not exactly a Profile in Courage but Al Gore endorses Barack Obama for President of the United States</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/06/17/not-exactly-a-profile-in-courage-but-al-gore-endorses-barack-obama-for-president-of-the-united-states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/06/17/not-exactly-a-profile-in-courage-but-al-gore-endorses-barack-obama-for-president-of-the-united-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>progress</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[al]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gore]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/06/17/not-exactly-a-profile-in-courage-but-al-gore-endorses-barack-obama-for-president-of-the-united-states/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night in Detroit, Michigan, former Vice President and former presidential candidate Al Gore endorsed Sen. Barack Obama for president.  One interesting fact is that Gore announced his presidential run on June 16, 1999, exactly nine years to the day that he endorses Barack Obama for President.  In his speech, Gore spoke specifically about how important [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night in Detroit, Michigan, former Vice President and former presidential candidate Al Gore endorsed Sen. Barack Obama for president.  One interesting fact is that Gore announced his presidential run on June 16, 1999, exactly nine years to the day that he endorses Barack Obama for President.  In his speech, Gore spoke specifically about how important elections are to our foreign policy, our Supreme Court,  Katrina, the Iraq War, wounded veterans, food safety, tainted products from China, and the national deficit.  The former vice president and preeminent expert on climate change reiterated that we need change with respect to our government as well as to how we solve our global warming crisis.  Alluding to John McCain, Gore also stressed that a long tenure in Washington DC does not amount to &#8220;judgement, wisdom, and vision.&#8221;  This endorsement is significant for the Obama campaign for one reason, &#8220;Florida, Florida, Florida.&#8221;  After the 2000 debacle, Al Gore is the poster child for what could have been.  Gore out on the campaign stump will remind a significant portion of  Floridian voters of what happened in the 2000 presidential campaign against George W. Bush.  Given the state of the economy and the many colossal foreign policy blunders of the Bush administration, Gore will be a vivid reminder of what many believe to be the injustice of 2000.  His presence will remind Floridians how important it is that they turn out in great numbers.  Further, considering the reaction of the Michigan crowd when Gore brought up the 2000 election, there are many still hoping to right that wrong.  It doesn&#8217;t help that McCain has a 95% pro-Bush voting record thereby making it easy for Floridians to replace the GW of 2000 with the McCain of 2008 enabling them to exact their vengeance.  So though Gore did not come out when it really could have given the Obama campaign a boost, his endorsement is still very valuable to the campaign especially if he backs it up by stumping for Obama in Florida.   Si Se Puede! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/06/17/not-exactly-a-profile-in-courage-but-al-gore-endorses-barack-obama-for-president-of-the-united-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama halts all VP speculation by his Campaign; Obama meets with Clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/06/06/barack-obama-halts-all-vp-speculation-from-his-campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/06/06/barack-obama-halts-all-vp-speculation-from-his-campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>progress</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hillary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[running]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/06/06/barack-obama-halts-all-vp-speculation-from-his-campaign/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two seconds after Obama clinched the nomination, the chattering class began punditing about who he should choose as his vice president.  Sen. Obama said as he was leaving DC that the next word that the public will hear from his campaign regarding the VP position is when he announces his vice president.  The Senator also said [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left">Two seconds after Obama clinched the nomination, the chattering class began punditing about who he should choose as his vice president.  Sen. Obama said as he was leaving DC that the next word that the public will hear from his campaign regarding the VP position is when he announces his vice president.  The Senator also said that his campaign will take its time deciding who will be his running mate.  Obama has also emphasized that this is one of the most important decisions that he will make and he will not be rushed in making it.  Obama confirmed that his campaign have begun the VP consideration process but such process will not be conducted in the press or through surrogates.  In addition, the Senator demonstrated just what kind of leader he intends to be yesterday.  Having just won the toughest, most protracted and contentious primary in decades, Obama did not rest on his laurels but flew to Washington DC and went to the Senate floor to introduce new legislation expanding public access to government spending.  While in DC Obama also INFORMED the party that Howard Dean would remain DNC chair.  The junior senator from Illinois and the new leader of the Democratic Party also INFORMED the Party that there will be no more lobbyist money taken by the DNC, a policy that he implemented in his campaign at its genesis.    And last but by no means least, Sen. Obama met with Sen. Clinton last night regarding beginning the process of uniting the party.  Both campaigns released the following statement,</p>
<p align="left"><strong>Joint Statement from Obama and Clinton Campaign</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p align="left">Senator Clinton and Senator Obama met tonight and had a productive discussion about the important work that needs to be done to succeed in November.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/06/06/barack-obama-halts-all-vp-speculation-from-his-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking: Clinton to Concede on Friday&#8230;.it&#8217;s about time!</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/06/04/breaking-clinton-to-concede-on-fridayits-about-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/06/04/breaking-clinton-to-concede-on-fridayits-about-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>progress</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[concede]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[friday]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hillary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[suspend]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[VP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/06/04/breaking-clinton-to-concede-on-fridayits-about-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According the New York Times, Sen. Hillary Clinton will suspend her campaign and endorse Sen. Barack Obama at an event on Friday Saturday in Washington DC.  Update:  Clinton will be holding events on both days in Washington, DC.  One private event on Friday, at her home, for staff and long time supporters; and one on Saturday, where Clinton will hold [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According the New York Times, Sen. Hillary Clinton will suspend her campaign and endorse Sen. Barack Obama at an event on <strike>Friday</strike> Saturday in Washington DC.  <strong>Update:</strong>  Clinton will be holding events on both days in Washington, DC.  One private event on Friday, at her home, for staff and long time supporters; and one on Saturday, where Clinton will hold a public event with Sen. Obama.  Clinton&#8217;s decision comes after intense pressure from her supporters and a signaling from the Obama campaign that her being VP is highly unlikely.  The reason given by the Obama campaign is that Bill Clinton may balk at the the notion of submitting to the vetting process.  The vetting process would require that Bill Clinton disclose all of his business dealings and a complete list of donors to his presidential library.  Jim Johnson, a member of Obama&#8217;s vice presidential vetting committe, established the rule after working on the vice presidential vetting committee for the Mondale-Ferraro campaign.  Because Johnson did not vet Geraldine Ferraro&#8217;s husband&#8217;s finances, a New York real estate businessman, the campaign suffered tremendously when he was rumoured to be linked to organized crime.  There were also questions raised as to Ferraro&#8217;s husband&#8217;s tax returns.  Regardless of whether there was any truth to the rumours, the damage was done.  So Bill Clinton would have to submit to the vetting process just like the spouses of all the other VP prospects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/06/04/breaking-clinton-to-concede-on-fridayits-about-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take Webb at His Word&#8230;&#8221;strongly encourage against&#8221; being approached for Veep spot</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/05/29/take-webb-at-his-wordstrongly-encourage-against-being-approached-for-veep-spot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/05/29/take-webb-at-his-wordstrongly-encourage-against-being-approached-for-veep-spot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>progress</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jim]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Webb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/05/29/take-webb-at-his-wordstrongly-encourage-against-being-approached-for-veep-spot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been significant punditry and widespread rumouring that Sen. Jim Webb would be a great VP for Barack Obama.  I disagree.  Sen. Webb has not endorsed Obama or any democratic candidate for that matter.  Webb continues to say that he has not felt the urge to endorse any of the candidates.  Webb also said that he would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been significant punditry and widespread rumouring that Sen. Jim Webb would be a great VP for Barack Obama.  I disagree.  Sen. Webb has not endorsed Obama or any democratic candidate for that matter.  Webb continues to say that he has not felt the urge to endorse any of the candidates.  Webb also said that he would strongly discourage either of the democratic candidates from asking him to be their VP.  Okay, in my opinion this gives Obama an easy out.  Webb has quite a bit of baggage with respect to women&#8217;s issues and  political decisions.  Webb&#8217;s track record would definitely take away from Obama&#8217;s message.  When I hear Webb speak I sense an awkward uneasiness with respect to the democratic platform. Perhaps because he is only newly democrat. Also, While Web may be a good politician, word on the street is that he is not very good at the campaigning/running aspect of the the political game.  Rumors are also circulating regarding former Virginia governor Mark Warner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/05/29/take-webb-at-his-wordstrongly-encourage-against-being-approached-for-veep-spot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton has become the Suicide Candidate&#8230;..who refuses To be Intimidated by the Will of the voters</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/03/10/clinton-has-become-the-suicide-candidatewho-refuses-to-be-intimidated-by-the-will-of-the-voters-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/03/10/clinton-has-become-the-suicide-candidatewho-refuses-to-be-intimidated-by-the-will-of-the-voters-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Delegates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[back of the bus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ed]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[governor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hillary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[meet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rendell]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[russert]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[the]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tim]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[two]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[won]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/03/10/clinton-has-become-the-suicide-candidatewho-refuses-to-be-intimidated-by-the-will-of-the-voters-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top Clinton campaign surrogate and Governor of Pennsylvania, Ed Rendell, said yesterday on Meet the Press with Tim Russert, that even if Obama is ahead in the popular vote, ahead in elected delegates, and ahead in states won, Clinton should still win the nomination.  In other words, okay kids (electorate),&#8230;go play in the romper room and let [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top Clinton campaign surrogate and Governor of Pennsylvania, Ed Rendell, said yesterday on Meet the Press with Tim Russert, that even if Obama is ahead in the popular vote, ahead in elected delegates, and ahead in states won, Clinton should still win the nomination.  In other words, okay kids (electorate),&#8230;go play in the romper room and let the grown ups take it from here.  Russert asked Rendell again&#8230;even if Obama is ahead in ELECTED delegates, should Obama win the nomination?  Rendell answered&#8230;no, Clinton should still be the nominee.  Rendell then said something to the effect of,  the voters don&#8217;t really understand what is going on so it&#8217;s up to us to make their decision for them..i.e. thank you kids&#8230;.the big boys will take over from here.  It is the height of insult and condescension to the American people, who are more informed and engaged and have come out and participated in greater numbers than any other election in history.  That inescapable fact seems to be irrelevant to the Clinton campaign.  According to Campaign Clinton, the will of the voters is immaterial.  The campaign&#8217;s attitude appears to be that the voters don&#8217;t matter&#8230;.us politicians (meaning the Clinton campaign and its surrogates), know what is best for America.  The campaign also continues to make the disingenuous argument that because Clinton won some of the big states that she somehow has an edge over Obama in a general election.  Does the Clinton campaign really expect the American people to believe that because she won a few LARGE states, by a small margin, that are ALWAYS won, with the exception of Ohio, by the democratic candidate in the general election, that hers is a stronger case than Obama&#8217;s double digit wins in both LARGE states and red states, therefore putting in play such republican states as Virginia, Missouri, Minnesota and Iowa for the general election???  Obama&#8217;s wins effectively enlarge the democratic electorate/base dramatically and demonstrably thereby significantly increasing the party&#8217;s chances of victory in the fall.  Just to put things in perspective, John Kerry won PENNSYLVANIA, New York, Rhode Island, New Jersey, California, and Massachusetts in the 2004 election against George W. Bush.  So all the states that the Clinton campaign claims as &#8221;better&#8221; wins than Obama&#8217;s, are solid blue states that have been won by the democratic candidate in the general election for the last several decades.  Therefore, it stands to reason and logic that Obama will also win such states in the fall.   Enough with the empty and false arguments.  The latest Clinton campaign strategy, at least in Mississippi, is the Jedi mind-trick strategy.  Clinton, behind in the popular vote, behind in states won, and behind in elected delegates, is attempting to offer Barack Obama the vice president position.  In other words, the person in the number two position, is offering the person in the number one position, the number two spot.  The Clinton campaign pushes this option in hopes of gaining votes by, what can only be described as, hoodwinking the American people into believing that such a ticket is possible.  Obama has flat out said that we will not see him as a vice presidential candidate on any ticket.  The offer is also illogical and inconsistent with Clinton&#8217;s assertion that Obama is not ready to be President.  Because every vice president has to be ready on &#8220;day one&#8221; to assume the presidential role, how then can you argue out of one side of your mouth that Obama is not ready to be President and out of the other side endorse him as vice president?  Either you believe that he is ready to be President or you do not.  We the voters are not so easily fooled as to accept both arguments as valid.  Luucy&#8230;you got some splaining to do.  Obviously, the campaign did not think either strategy through before putting it out there. To top it off, Clinton essentially said that John McCain is ready to be President, she is ready to be President, but Barack Obama is not.  Clinton actually argues that the republican candidate is a better option than the leading candidate in her own party.  In this writers opinion, Clinton has officially become the suicide candidate.  As she detonates herself, she plans to detonate the entire Democratic party along with her, thereby gifting the White House to the republicans in the fall.  It seems that Clinton&#8217;s loyalty is to herself first, to the Democratic party second, and to the the voters&#8230;.a very distant last.  Viva Clinton!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/03/10/clinton-has-become-the-suicide-candidatewho-refuses-to-be-intimidated-by-the-will-of-the-voters-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
