<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProgressPolitics &#187; McCain</title>
	<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>GOP Congressional Candidates closing argument&#8230;..don&#8217;t vote for my Opponent because McCain is going to Lose</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/27/gop-congressional-candidates-closing-argumentdont-vote-for-my-opponent-because-mccain-is-going-to-lose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/27/gop-congressional-candidates-closing-argumentdont-vote-for-my-opponent-because-mccain-is-going-to-lose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/27/gop-congressional-candidates-closing-argumentdont-vote-for-my-opponent-because-mccain-is-going-to-lose/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP and John McCain are saying that voters should vote for either so that Democrats don&#8217;t win the particular branch of government that the person speaking at the time is not running in.  This is the argument that the GOP is using to urge voters to vote for their candidate to stop the Democrats from winning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP and John McCain are saying that voters should vote for either so that Democrats don&#8217;t win the particular branch of government that the person speaking at the time is not running in.  This is the argument that the GOP is using to urge voters to vote for their candidate to stop the Democrats from winning the majority in Congress and also winning the Executive office.  Yes, this is what the congressional candidates have in their arsenal to try and prevent their democratic rivals from winning their Senate and House seats on Nov 4th.  Don&#8217;t vote for my opponent because John McCain is going to lose.  Sen. McCain&#8217;s closing argument, don&#8217;t vote for Sen. Obama because my congressional colleagues are going to lose all the seats in contention in their States and Districts on Nov 4th.  Neither the GOP nor McCain offer any real solutions to the real problems facing Americans but again are trying to use the same scare tactics that they used in 2004.  They are hoping that Americans have a short memory, and by short I mean nonexistent.  They hope Americans will forget that it was GOP policies, endorsed wholeheartedly by Sen. John McCain,  and the policies of  its leader George W. Bush, who McCain voted with 90% of the time, that caused our current crisis. </p>
<p>This is a losing argument for Sen. John McCain and the GOP and it just shows how both are completely out of touch with the American people. They are basically admitting that either is going to lose so vote for me.   We have absolutely nothing in terms of policies to help you and the policies proposed by our democratic opponents are far superior than anything we can come up with so vote for us because we don&#8217;t want them to be successful.  Rediculous closing argument. </p>
<p>To be effective, a Democratic president needs the support of a Democratic congress.  We need a real break from the last eight years and a completely new direction.  Lets do what we need to do in order to make that happen.  This will be a very close race, so please VOTE and encourage others to vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/27/gop-congressional-candidates-closing-argumentdont-vote-for-my-opponent-because-mccain-is-going-to-lose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain beat AGAIN&#8230;.Obama trounces McCain in the THIRD and FINAL debate!  Oh yea, and a few words about Joe the Plumber</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/16/mccain-beat-againobama-trounces-mccain-in-the-third-and-final-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/16/mccain-beat-againobama-trounces-mccain-in-the-third-and-final-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[POLLS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[joe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[plumber]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/16/mccain-beat-againobama-trounces-mccain-in-the-third-and-final-debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Independent vote is in and Sen. Barack Obama won last night by an even wider margin than he did in previous debates.  In a CNN poll of several hundred independent debate watchers, 57% of the independents said that Obama won the debate.  Only 31% said McCain won the debate.  In a CBS poll, 53% of uncommitted voters said that Obama won the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Independent vote is in and Sen. Barack Obama won last night by an even wider margin than he did in previous debates.  In a CNN poll of several hundred independent debate watchers, 57% of the independents said that Obama won the debate.  Only 31% said McCain won the debate.  In a CBS poll, 53% of uncommitted voters said that Obama won the debate while only 22% said that McCain won.  A Fox News focus group was asked which candidate won the debate and a &#8220;clear majority&#8221; of the group said that Obama won.  Finally, an MSNBC poll showed that Obama won the debate 20 to 7.  It looks as if this final debate was not the game-changer that McCain was hoping for. </p>
<p>And by the way, Joe the plumber, who makes over a quarter million dollars a year, is not your average Joe.  To compare this plumber who is making over $250,000 a year to Joe sixpack or your average Joe who makes under $50,000 a year is insulting to our intelligence.  The McCain campaign believes that because his name is Joe and he is a plumber that they can bamboozle voters into believing that this guy is your average American struggling to make ends meet in this floundering economy.  Well Joe is quarter millionaire Joe.  Yes, Joe who makes more than 95% of Americans will have to pay the same tax percentage that was paid by that tax bracket during the Clinton administration&#8230;&#8230;you remember, when the economy was flourishing.  The amazing irony, as highlighted by Sen. Obama, is that had Joe the plumber been receiving the tax cuts for the middle class that Obama proposes when Joe was working 12-hour days and trying to save enough money to buy his plumbing business, Joe the plumber could have bought his plumbing business alot sooner than he has under the Bush-McCain tax plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/16/mccain-beat-againobama-trounces-mccain-in-the-third-and-final-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red State co-founder votes for Govenor Bobby Jindal for President and NOT Sen. John McCain</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/13/red-state-co-founder-votes-for-govenor-bobby-jindal-for-president-and-not-sen-john-mccain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/13/red-state-co-founder-votes-for-govenor-bobby-jindal-for-president-and-not-sen-john-mccain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bobby]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jindal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/13/red-state-co-founder-votes-for-govenor-bobby-jindal-for-president-and-not-sen-john-mccain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow&#8230;.more Republicans fall out of line after being frightened away from McCain and his campaign.  RedState co-founder Joshua Trevino wrote on his blog yesterday that he just could not bring himself to vote for the McCain-Palin ticket.  And rather than keep this treachery to himself, Trevino decided to confess for all his fellow republicans to see.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;.more Republicans fall out of line after being frightened away from McCain and his campaign.  RedState co-founder Joshua Trevino wrote on his blog yesterday that he just could not bring himself to vote for the McCain-Palin ticket.  And rather than keep this treachery to himself, Trevino decided to confess for all his fellow republicans to see.  His fellow republicans in Ohio, Florida, Virginia, Colorado, and all the other battleground states.  This suggests to this observer that perhaps Trevino is saying that, in his eyes, McCain-Palin is not equipped for the task of leading the nation.   <a target="_blank" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/12/redstate-co-founder-cant_n_133970.html" title="See article.">See article.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>In the end, I couldn&#8217;t do it. My California ballot arrived in the mail today, and I opened it fully intending to vote for John McCain. I filled out the state propositions first &#8212; yes on 8, no on everything proposing a new bond or new spending &#8212; then the local offices, straight Republican excepting Kevin Johnson for (nonpartisan) Sacramento mayor. Finally, the vote for President of the United States: an academic exercise in California, where Barack Obama will surely win by a crushing margin. But good citizenship demands voting as if it matters. Do I believe in John McCain? Not as much as I used to. Do I believe in Sarah Palin? Despite my early enthusiasm for her, now not at all. Do I believe in the national Republican Party? Not in the slightest &#8212; even though I see no meaningful alternative to it. So, my choice for President in 2008, scrawled in my ballot as an act of futile protest, is Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana. If nothing else, I am confident this is the first of several votes I will cast for him in years to come.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/13/red-state-co-founder-votes-for-govenor-bobby-jindal-for-president-and-not-sen-john-mccain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William Kristol:  McCain running a &#8220;stupid&#8221; and &#8220;pathetic&#8221; campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/13/william-kristol-mccain-running-a-stupid-and-pathetic-campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/13/william-kristol-mccain-running-a-stupid-and-pathetic-campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[kristol]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[william]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/13/william-kristol-mccain-running-a-stupid-and-pathetic-campaign/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is open mutiny in the GOP regarding John McCain and his campaign.  William Kristol, GOP conservative columnist, said this weekend on Fox News Sunday that McCain is running a &#8220;stupid&#8221; and &#8220;pathetic&#8221; campaign.  Kristol went on to say that the campaign has no strategy and they are flailing around with absolutely direction.  Kristol further opined that the McCain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is open mutiny in the GOP regarding John McCain and his campaign.  William Kristol, GOP conservative columnist, said this weekend on <em>Fox News Sunday</em> that McCain is running a &#8220;stupid&#8221; and &#8220;pathetic&#8221; campaign.  Kristol went on to say that the campaign has no strategy and they are flailing around with absolutely direction.  Kristol further opined that the McCain campaign does things that don&#8217;t work and they keep on doing them.  The campaign and it&#8217;s candidate are giving conflicting messages to put it mildly.  The entire operation is in complete disarray.  This is a blinding bright light peaking into what a McCain administration would look like and how McCain would would lead it.  Complete chaos.  Do you really think that McCain is capable of running this country given the state of of his campaign?  The McCain campaign strategy is a series of reactions with no long term plan. The Arizona senator has proven this by not bothering to put together a transition team, having no economic plan, having no exit strategy for Iraq, and on, and on.  McCain strategic plan for winning this election&#8230;..hope for a national security emergency to pop up at the last minute.  However, even if such an emergency did happen, McCain has showed that he is the worst candidate to handle it.  In both debates, Sen. Barack Obama has demonstrated leadership and a calm level headininess that we expect from our leader in a national security crisis.  McCain&#8217;s reputation as a warmonger and his demonstrated tendency to overreact and respond in an excitable and reactionary way shows that he is more likely, in a national security emergency, to make the situation much worse.  The senator from Arizona has no vision for putting America back on track. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/13/william-kristol-mccain-running-a-stupid-and-pathetic-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John McCain&#8230;.the campaign that you are running is Offensive to the American people</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/10/john-mccainthe-campaign-that-you-are-running-is-offensive-to-the-american-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/10/john-mccainthe-campaign-that-you-are-running-is-offensive-to-the-american-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[race-baiting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/10/john-mccainthe-campaign-that-you-are-running-is-offensive-to-the-american-people/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our economy is in horrendous shape and Sen. John McCain thinks that the American people haven&#8217;t noticed?  Yesterday, the dow plunged almost 700 points, the NASDAQ dropped 95 points, ands the S&#38;P dropped 75 points, but what is the McCain campaign focused on?  Baseless inflammatory accusations against Sen. Barack Obama.  Where is your plan Sen. McCain?  Where is your plan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our economy is in horrendous shape and Sen. John McCain thinks that the American people haven&#8217;t noticed?  Yesterday, the dow plunged almost 700 points, the NASDAQ dropped 95 points, ands the S&amp;P dropped 75 points, but what is the McCain campaign focused on?  Baseless inflammatory accusations against Sen. Barack Obama.  Where is your plan Sen. McCain?  Where is your plan to fix the economy?  Inciting right-wing lunatics into making violent threats against your opponent is not a plan. I t is however, a desperate, pathetic attempt to win at any cost.  People are worried about their job, their home, their retirement account, their savings account, and the fact that McCain thinks that he can distract voters with insidious nonsense rather than offering real solutions, is insulting to the average voter&#8217;s intelligence. </p>
<p>I guess that we should not be surprised by McCain or the Republican party when it comes to the level of distraction in which they will engage in order to steal this election.  The swift boatee has now become the swift boater.   The fact that the McCain is banking on a not so silent whisper campaign of racism as it&#8217;s primary campaign strategy is dishonorable and pathetic.  It also speaks to the erratic, ridiculous, and spasmodic  nature of the Arizona senator&#8217;s managing style.  For example, lets discuss the transition plans of both candidates shall we?  McCain&#8217;s transition team is nonexistent&#8230;McCain has decided not to worry about such things now because he doesn&#8217;t want to jinx it.  Yes, that is actually his true reason and spoken like a true gambler I might add.  This is unprecedented.  No primary candidate in history has ever not had an elaborate and intricate plan of transition into the White House for when the current occupant exit.  Why&#8230;because the new occupant has to hit the ground running and will not have time to engage in the very detailed vetting process of making appointments, staffing key positions, developing policy positions, etc.  Obama on the other hand has developed an elaborate network that is staffed with dozens of key people with very impressive resumes to help prepare for his possible move to the White House in January 2009.   It has never been more critical that the transition from one administration to the next is as seamless as possible given the current state of our nation&#8217;s affairs.  I guess McCain&#8217;s plan is to just wing it.</p>
<p>Finally, this is a time that we as a people need to come together and unify the country to try and navigate our way out of our current economic adversity.  However, McCain and his campaign has decided that divisiveness and winning at all cost is much more important.  Apparently, the current state of our nation in crisis is a distant last when it comes to the unbridled desires of John McCain.  And that, ladies and gentlemen, is offensive. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/10/john-mccainthe-campaign-that-you-are-running-is-offensive-to-the-american-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton on &#8220;Mavericks in Washington&#8221; (VIDEO)</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/09/hillary-clinton-on-mavericks-in-washington-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/09/hillary-clinton-on-mavericks-in-washington-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hillary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/09/hillary-clinton-on-mavericks-in-washington-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NQx6spIBb5E&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NQx6spIBb5E&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/09/hillary-clinton-on-mavericks-in-washington-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KEATINGNOMICS (video)</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/09/keatingnomics-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/09/keatingnomics-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[charles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[keating]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/09/keatingnomics-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IDofbll86dY&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IDofbll86dY&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/09/keatingnomics-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate: &#8220;That one&#8221;&#8230;.just schooled you on your own playground</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/08/debate-that-onejust-schooled-you-on-your-own-turf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/08/debate-that-onejust-schooled-you-on-your-own-turf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/08/debate-that-onejust-schooled-you-on-your-own-turf/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. John McCain has been goading Sen. Barack Obama for months to have a townhall meeting perceiving himself as some kind of master of this style of debate.  Well, last night McCain got his shot and guess what?  Obama took the school and the town in which it&#8217;s located.  CNN conducted a poll of independent  voters watching [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. John McCain has been goading Sen. Barack Obama for months to have a townhall meeting perceiving himself as some kind of master of this style of debate.  Well, last night McCain got his shot and guess what?  Obama took the school and the town in which it&#8217;s located.  CNN conducted a poll of independent  voters watching the debate and Obama won the debate 54% to 30%.  Fox News (yes that&#8217;s right), CNN, and CBS, independent viewer polls show that Obama won the debate. By the way Sen. McCain, yes the majority of voters have heard of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Voters in this election are a pretty smart group.  They are newly engaged, and to your detriment, they are paying attention to this presidential race.  So you saying that the average voter probably don&#8217;t know what is Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, is condescending and insulting to the average American&#8217;s intelligence.</p>
<p>As for McCain&#8217;s claim that he wants to buy up home mortgages and renegotiate those mortgages at the &#8221;face&#8221; value of those homes&#8230;.really?  Is that why McCain&#8217;s own party tried to prevent and intimidate the citizens of Michigan affected by foreclosures from voting?   Yea&#8230;somehow it is doubtful that McCain or his party has the interest of  citizens caught up in the subprime debacle at the top of their priority list.  And by the way&#8230;this is a proposal that has already been passed by Congress and is existing law.  And guess what, Sen. Obama <a target="_blank" href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/factchecking_debate_no_2.html" title="endorsed the idea">endorsed a similar, better idea </a>two weeks ago and the proposal is included in the $700 billion dollar bailout package.  So McCain&#8217;s claim that it is his idea is completely false.  The a better proposal and law is already on the books and had McCain did a search on &#8220;the Google&#8221; he could have found out that information before claiming the bad idea as his own.   McCain has been in Washington for 26 years, where was all the concern or effort to help &#8220;put Americans back to work&#8221; during his 26 year tenure?  All of a sudden, now that he is running for President, McCain is a friend of the working class.  Sen. McCain is again trying to mislead the American people.  We do not trust you to do what you claim because of the history of you and your campaign misleading the public.  </p>
<p>As for McCain&#8217;s claim that we are sending $700 billion dollars a year to countries that do not like us very much&#8230;he repeats this false claim in most of his speeches regarding energy independence.  Factcheck.org <a target="_blank" href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/factchecking_debate_no_2.html" title="had this to say">had this to say</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve got to stop sending $700 billion a year to countries that don&#8217;t want us very – like us very much&#8221; ([McCain] actually used the figure three times in the debate.) He&#8217;s talking about what we spend importing oil, and he&#8217;s said the same thing <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/factchecking_debate_no_1.html"><font color="#023f7e">at the last debate</font></a> and numerous other times. At <a href="http://%20http//tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_spt_s1_d.htm"><font color="#023f7e">current oil prices</font></a>, the correct figure is about $493 billion. About a third of that goes to Canada, Mexico and the United Kingdom, which were still on the friendly side of the ledger last time we looked.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/08/debate-that-onejust-schooled-you-on-your-own-turf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain drops out of Michigan!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/03/mccain-drops-out-of-michigan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/03/mccain-drops-out-of-michigan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[drops]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[michigan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[out]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/03/mccain-drops-out-of-michigan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. John McCain has closed up shop in Michigan.  The Arizona senator has virtually conceded the state and its 17 electoral votes to Sen. Barack Obama.  Michigan was a key state to the McCain strategy of trying to pick off a democratic state in order to succeed on November 4th.  It is becoming increasingly more difficult for McCain to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. John McCain has closed up shop in Michigan.  The Arizona senator has virtually conceded the state and its 17 electoral votes to Sen. Barack Obama.  Michigan was a key state to the McCain strategy of trying to pick off a democratic state in order to succeed on November 4th.  It is becoming increasingly more difficult for McCain to carve out a path of victory on Nov 4th..  There are not many options at this point. Polls show that Obama has a double digit lead in the state.  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/1008/McCain_pulling_out_of_Michigan.html?showall" title="Read full story">Read full story.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>John McCain is pulling out of Michigan, according to two Republicans, a stunning move a month away from Election Day that indicates the difficulty Republicans are having in finding blue states to put in play.</p>
<p>McCain will go off TV in Michigan, stop dropping mail there and send most of his staff to more competitive states, including Wisconsin, Ohio and Florida. Wisconsin went for Kerry in 2004, Ohio and Florida for Bush.</p>
<p>A McCain aide confirmed the move and chalked it up to the state&#8217;s Democratic tilt and the resources Obama had put in place there.</p>
<p>&#8220;It was always a long shot for us to win,&#8221; said the aide.  </p>
<p>McCain will now turn his attention to bolstering his defenses in Ohio and Florida while putting more resources into Wisconsin, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and the second congressional district of Maine, where there is a sole electoral vote available.  </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/03/mccain-drops-out-of-michigan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t underestimate Palin&#8230;she is a skilled debater</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/02/dont-underestimate-palinshe-is-a-skilled-debater/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/02/dont-underestimate-palinshe-is-a-skilled-debater/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[palin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Biden]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gwen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ifill]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sarah]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vice presidential]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/02/dont-underestimate-palinshe-is-a-skilled-debater/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of us are on pins and needles in anticipation of tonight&#8217;s vice presidential debate featuring Sen. Joe Biden and Gov. Sarah Palin.  Most think that Biden will wipe the floor with Palin and under normal circumstances that may be true.  However, these are not normal circumstances. The McCain fought and fought hard to get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of us are on pins and needles in anticipation of tonight&#8217;s vice presidential debate featuring Sen. Joe Biden and Gov. Sarah Palin.  Most think that Biden will wipe the floor with Palin and under normal circumstances that may be true.  However, these are not normal circumstances. The McCain fought and fought hard to get a more structured format where Palin&#8217;s lack of knowlege will not be as obvious.  Also, Palin is a skilled debater,  she did win the Alaskan gubernatorial debate against a seasoned democratic opponent.  Further, Palin has been practicing night and day almost since she was selected as McCain&#8217;s running mate.  Palin is also a quick study.  Lastly, Palin has a folksy and affable personality where she can deliver her out-of-the-mainstream views in an ingratiating or affecting way.  Her delivery is less jarring and less offensive than most right wing candidates.  Sen. Biden really needs to be respectful but clear as to why this woman is unqualified to be a heartbeat away from the presidency.  Most of all, Biden needs to be succinct.  The McCain campaign has already sent out the talking points regarding Gwen Ifill&#8217;s book that has not been released yet claiming that the 27 year veteran journalist cannot be objective.  Hopefully, such talking points will not deter Ifill from asking both candidates the tough questions.  We don&#8217;t think that it will.  Besides, Ifill also moderating the vice presidential debates in 2004&#8230;.she is a seasoned professional whose credentials and objectivity is beyond reproach.  Interesting as to why the right wing would be questioning her objectivity at this particular time.  We are sure that the Biden and Ifill are sexist talking points are already drafted for Friday&#8217;s news cycle.  Gwen Ifill will do her job and do her job well the same as always.  Give me a freakin break!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/10/02/dont-underestimate-palinshe-is-a-skilled-debater/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is this what you call leadership Sen. McCain?</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/30/is-this-what-you-call-leadership-sen-mccain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/30/is-this-what-you-call-leadership-sen-mccain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/30/is-this-what-you-call-leadership-sen-mccain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Thursday Sen. John McCain dropped everything to come to Washington DC to solve the Wall Street meltdown.  The Arizona senator cancelled his appearance on David Letterman, appeared on CBS, suspended his campaign, and immediately came to Capitol Hill for a meeting with President Bush.  Then on Sunday McCain and his senior campaign manager took full [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Thursday Sen. John McCain dropped everything to come to Washington DC to solve the Wall Street meltdown.  The Arizona senator cancelled his appearance on David Letterman, appeared on CBS, suspended his campaign, and immediately came to Capitol Hill for a meeting with President Bush.  Then on Sunday McCain and his senior campaign manager took full credit for the bipartisan agreement that came about on Sunday evening.  McCain patted himself on the back for bringing House Republicans to the negotiation table.  Leadership.  Monday the Republicans voted the bill down.  Why?  Because their feelings were hurt.  Give me a break.  These people were elected to be stewards of the American economy as well as the American public as a whole.  You do not abdicate from that fundamental responsibility because your feelings got hurt.  It appears that Republicans have put their interest in being re-elected above the interest of the American people.  If John McCain, as an aspiring official leader of the republican party, cannot even unify his own party for the benefit of  the nation, what kind of leader will he be in the White House?  By the way, where is the current leader&#8230;..President Bush?  Why was he unable to rally his party behind this bill that he claims is essential to stabilize our financial markets?  This is President Bush&#8217;s proposal yet his own party will not support it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/30/is-this-what-you-call-leadership-sen-mccain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson agrees that the House Republicans are trying to sabotage the Wall Street Bailout deal - McCain&#8217;s solution, more deregulation of the Markets</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/26/treasury-secretary-henry-paulson-that-the-house-republicans-are-trying-to-sabotage-the-wall-street-bailout-deal-mccains-solution-more-deregulation-of-the-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/26/treasury-secretary-henry-paulson-that-the-house-republicans-are-trying-to-sabotage-the-wall-street-bailout-deal-mccains-solution-more-deregulation-of-the-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[deal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[street]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/26/treasury-secretary-henry-paulson-that-the-house-republicans-are-trying-to-sabotage-the-wall-street-bailout-deal-mccains-solution-more-deregulation-of-the-markets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is John McCain and the House Republicans (Far, far, right republicans or conservatives) who are trying to destroy the bailout deal that was on its way to being solidified Thursday afternoon.  Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said as much  yesterday:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, &#8220;We&#8217;re not the ones trying to blow this up; it&#8217;s the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is John McCain and the House Republicans (Far, far, right republicans or conservatives) who are trying to destroy the bailout deal that was on its way to being solidified Thursday afternoon.  Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/stephanopoulo-6.html" title="said as much">said as much  </a>yesterday:</p>
<blockquote><p>House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, &#8220;We&#8217;re not the ones trying to blow this up; it&#8217;s the House Republicans.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I know, I know,&#8221; Paulson replied.</p></blockquote>
<p>Until McCain air-dropped down onto Capitol Hill, after an almost six month absence, and caused a break down of the negotiations, Congress was on its way to sealing the deal.  The fundamentals of the deal had been agreed upon and both sides were on their way to a developing consensus.  Then McCain showed up.  A blind man can see through this very obvious and desperate attempt to resuscitate an ailing campaign that is caught in a downward spiral.  The consensus of Republicans and Democrats on th Hill is that McCain severely disrupted the negotiation process by dropping in and injecting presidential politics and partisanship into an almost completed bipartisan effort.  The Arizona senator did not propose an alternative plan, McCain came to DC to cause chaos for the sake of causing chaos.  He was silent almost the entire time during the meeting with Bush.  No offering of solutions or even possibilities.  But it is essential that he be on Capitol Hill at this time (snark). </p>
<p>House Republicans, consistent with McCain&#8217;s belief and tacit support, propose that the bailout be funded through private money.  They also propose a suspension  of  “mark-to-market regulatory rules for long-term assets.”  More deregulation!! Seriously!  The proposal has already been rejected as not feasible by Secretary Paulson, a member of the Republican party by the way.  Free-market, free-market, free-market, free of all government regulation was McCain&#8217;s public mantra before last week.  The proposal by the House Republicans is a completely ridiculous non-starter and an obvious ploy by House Republicans to help McCain with his excuse not to show up at the debate tonight and face the American people.  Such Republicans claim that<span> Paulson&#8217;s plan “fundamentally alters the nation’s free-market system in that it broadly socializes firms&#8217; money-losing mortgage assets and places the U.S. on a slippery slope whereby profits will also be nationalized.”  Last week, McCain listed his conditions for a bailout plan, the bipartisan proposal included such conditions.  Apparently,  McCain looked at his falling poll numbers and changed his mind.  Lets call it what it is, McCain is gambling with the American economy in order to rehabilitate his campaign.  He is willing to gamble America&#8217;s standing in the world to win this election.  And by the way, the world is listening.  The German Minister of Economics is now saying that America will no longer be a powerful nation.  McCain has always been a gambler but now he is a gambler gambling with someone elses money.  McCain first, Country second.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/26/treasury-secretary-henry-paulson-that-the-house-republicans-are-trying-to-sabotage-the-wall-street-bailout-deal-mccains-solution-more-deregulation-of-the-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain&#8230;.Wait&#8230;Wait&#8230;Timeout&#8230;Timeout;  Media reaction</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/25/mccainwaitwaittimeouttimeoutmedia-reaction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/25/mccainwaitwaittimeouttimeoutmedia-reaction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[friday]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[postpone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/25/mccainwaitwaittimeouttimeoutmedia-reaction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John McCain has asked to call off the debate on Friday because he feels that his immediate presence is needed in Washington DC.  McCain has not been to work since April but now he feels that he should miss the debate to address the financial situation.  As scary as the idea, in and of itself, of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John McCain has asked to call off the debate on Friday because he feels that his immediate presence is needed in Washington DC.  McCain has not been to work since April but now he feels that he should miss the debate to address the financial situation.  As scary as the idea, in and of itself, of McCain being the person handling the economic turmoil that our financial industry finds itself in, McCain makes this decision at a time when we the voters need to hear his plan for getting us out of this mess.  Attempting to postpone the debate makes him appear unprepared, desperate, and unable to handle more than one thing at a time.  Hey wait&#8230;turns out that McCain isn&#8217;t prepared.  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/25/us/politics/25campaign.html?_r=2&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin" title="Link">Link</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The debate on Friday was to focus on Mr. McCain’s perceived strength, foreign policy. Mr. McCain had not planned to devote large blocks of time to debate practice as did Mr. Obama, who was holing up with a tight circle of advisers at a hotel in Clearwater, Fla., on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday to prepare. Mr. McCain had a preparatory session on Wednesday afternoon at the <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/m/morgan_library/index.html?inline=nyt-org" title="More articles about Morgan Library"><font color="#004276">Morgan Library</font></a> in Manhattan, but advisers said it had been interrupted by his decision, announced immediately afterward, to suspend his campaign </p></blockquote>
<p>For the record, though McCain claims that his suggestion is an effort to rise above politics, his decision to delay the debate could not be more political.  The polls came out yesterday showing Sen. Obama with a growing lead and McCain and his campaign panicked.  Obama is within four points of McCain in West Virginia!!!!!!  West Virginia is solid red country!!!  They realized that Sen. Obama has the wind at his back and the McCain campaign are trying to turn off the fan with a political stunt because they can&#8217;t do so with a good economic plan (they don&#8217;t have one).   Not only does McCain think that the current situation warrants a delay of his debate but warrants a canceling of the vice presidential debate.  Seriously?????  Do they really think that the American people are going to put Palin in the White House without hearing her debate and speak in a non-McCain staged environment.  McCain does not sit on any of the relevant committees that are currently in deep negotiations.  Several Congressmen have come out and said that McCain&#8217;s presence would actually hurt the process.   The crisis began a week ago..you remember&#8230;&#8230;when McCain said that &#8220;the fundamentals of our economy is strong.&#8221;  Why didn&#8217;t McCain cancel the debate at that time?  McCain appears frantic and erratic&#8230;&#8230;he does not appear to be the steady leader we expect of a future President.   If we had a debate in 1934 during D-Day we think that McCain can make his way down to Ole Miss without the the nation falling into a vortex.  You need to be able to multitask as the leader of the free world.  What&#8217;s next&#8230;..should we suspend the election until McCain catches up?  The main stream media has rejected McCain&#8217;s latest ploy as pure politics. </p>
<p>It was stated best in Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s <em><a target="_blank" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122230374700773663.html" title="Wall Street Journal">Wall Street Journal</a></em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Last we checked, the President of the United States was still George W. Bush, the Secretary of the Treasury was still Henry Paulson, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve was still Ben Bernanke, and Congress still had 533 members not running for President who are at least nominally competent to debate and pass legislation.</p>
<p>So count us as mystified by Senator John McCain&#8217;s decision yesterday to suspend his campaign and call for a postponement in Friday&#8217;s first Presidential debate so that he and Barack Obama can work out a consensus bill to stabilize the financial system. This is supposed to be evidence of leadership<strong>?</strong></p></blockquote>
<p> <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/24/AR2008092403918.html?hpid=opinionsbox1" title="Washington Post">Washington Post</a></em></p>
<blockquote><p>Can McCain pull this off - persuading the public to forget how he and his fellow Reagan Republicans changed the nation&#8217;s economic rules in ways that allowed Wall Street to run amok, and refocusing its attention on his decisiveness at this moment of crisis? I doubt it&#8230;&#8230;.McCain&#8217;s ploy was transparent.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a target="_blank" href="http://windowsxp-privacy.net/?id=01502200020" title="The Dallas Daily News">The Dallas Daily News</a></em></p>
<blockquote><p>Democrats accused Mr. McCain of pulling a stunt to halt a slide in the polls. They also tweaked him for declaring the economic situation so dire it requires suspension of his campaign, a week after he declared the fundamentals of the economy are sound.</p>
<p>Some independent analysts agreed. &#8220;It is a stunt. It is a ploy,&#8221; said David S. Birdsell, dean of the school of public affairs at Baruch College in New York, an expert on presidential debates.</p>
<p>He called it a &#8220;very high-risk strategy&#8221; for Mr. McCain to take responsibility for brokering a solution to the economic crisis. &#8220;He&#8217;s not president yet,&#8221; Dr. Birdsell said, adding that pulling out of a debate is unprecedented. &#8220;That notion that we take one of the most sacred obligations and rituals of American politics and suspend it because there&#8217;s an urgent national question is highly problematic.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/sep/25/dont-delay-the-debate/" title="Rocky Mountain News (CO):">Rocky Mountain News (CO):</a></p>
<blockquote><p>If Winston Churchill could leave London in December 1941 and travel to America to address a joint session of Congress even as British troops in the Far East were reeling under Japanese attacks, somehow we think John McCain can make his way down to Oxford, Miss., for a debate Friday evening without imperiling the future of America. In this case, Barack Obama is right.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/25/opinion/25thu1.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion&amp;oref=slogin" title="New York Times Editorial">New York Times Editorial</a></p>
<blockquote><p>We don’t know if Mr. McCain or Mr. Obama will do any good back in Washington. But Mr. McCain’s idea of postponing the Friday night debate was another <strong>wild gesture from a candidate entirely too prone to them</strong>. The nation needs to hear Mr. Obama and Mr. McCain debate this crisis and demonstrate who is ready to lead. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/25/mccainwaitwaittimeouttimeoutmedia-reaction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative George Will suggests McCain not suited For the Presidency</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/23/conservative-george-will-suggests-mccain-not-suited-for-the-presidency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/23/conservative-george-will-suggests-mccain-not-suited-for-the-presidency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[George]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Will]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/23/conservative-george-will-suggests-mccain-not-suited-for-the-presidency/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past weekend on This Week, George Will said that John McCain&#8217;s response to this financial crisis made conservatives &#8220;fearful&#8221; of McCain&#8217;s decision making process.  We have been saying this all along.  McCain tends to make knee-jerk, impetuous, impulsive decisions out the box and then tries to clean up after himself later.  This could not be more evident than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This past weekend on <em>This Week,</em> George Will said that John McCain&#8217;s response to this financial crisis made conservatives &#8220;fearful&#8221; of McCain&#8217;s decision making process.  We have been saying this all along.  McCain tends to make knee-jerk, impetuous, impulsive decisions out the box and then tries to clean up after himself later.  This could not be more evident than when he chose Sarah Palin as his running mate.  The McCain campaign has chosen to shield Palin from the press in hopes that the American people will forget that she is applying to be a heartbeat away from the presidency.  We pointed out back in May that people should look at McCain&#8217;s temperament and decide if the Arizona senator is the type of person we want making decisions for our nation in times of crisis.  Will said on Sunday that McCain &#8220;showed his personality [last] week.&#8221;  We agree.  McCain is showing us how he will lead, we should pay attention and believe him.  When you have a hard core GOP conservative like George Will raising red flags about McCain&#8217;s temperament&#8230;&#8230;again, pay attention.  Will expands on his concerns below.</p>
<blockquote><p>Channeling his inner Queen of Hearts, John McCain furiously, and apparently without even looking around at facts, said Chris Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, should be decapitated. This childish reflex provoked the Wall Street Journal to editorialize that &#8220;McCain untethered&#8221; &#8212; disconnected from knowledge and principle &#8212; had made a &#8220;false and deeply unfair&#8221; attack on Cox that was &#8220;unpresidential&#8221;</p>
<p>In any case, McCain&#8217;s smear &#8212; that Cox &#8220;betrayed the public&#8217;s trust&#8221; &#8212; is a harbinger of a McCain presidency. For McCain, politics is always operatic, pitting people who agree with him against those who are &#8220;corrupt&#8221; or &#8220;betray the public&#8217;s trust,&#8221; two categories that seem to be exhaustive &#8212; there are no other people.</p>
<p>Conservatives who insist that electing McCain is crucial usually start, and increasingly end, by saying he would make excellent judicial selections. But the more one sees of his impulsive, intensely personal reactions to people and events, the less confidence one has that he would select judges by calm reflection and clear principles, having neither patience nor aptitude for either.</p>
<p>It is arguable that, because of his inexperience, Obama is not ready for the presidency. It is arguable that McCain, because of his boiling moralism and bottomless reservoir of certitudes, is not suited to the presidency. Unreadiness can be corrected, although perhaps at great cost, by experience. Can a dismaying temperament be fixed? &#8220;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/23/conservative-george-will-suggests-mccain-not-suited-for-the-presidency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain does NOT Regret his vote to Deregulate Wall St&#8230;&#8230;are you kidding me??? (Video)</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/22/mccain-does-not-regret-his-vote-to-deregulate-wall-stare-you-kidding-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/22/mccain-does-not-regret-his-vote-to-deregulate-wall-stare-you-kidding-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[60 minutes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[deregulation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/22/mccain-does-not-regret-his-vote-to-deregulate-wall-stare-you-kidding-me/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. John McCain, at the helm every time the nation has experienced a financial crisis, now claims that he is the one that will fix this problem.  McCain was in Congress and was implicated in the Keating Five scandal or more popularly known as the savings and loan crisis.  You know, the crisis that resulted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. John McCain, at the helm every time the nation has experienced a financial crisis, now claims that he is the one that will fix this problem.  McCain was in Congress and was implicated in the Keating Five scandal or more popularly known as the savings and loan crisis.  You know, the crisis that resulted in a government bailout of  $126 billion dollars. </p>
<p>McCain was also one of the Senators who helped pass the deregulation bill that caused the current crisis.  McCain had this to say about the bill&#8217;s passing on <em>60 Minutes</em> last night:</p>
<blockquote><p>Q: In 1999, you were one of the senators who helped pass deregulation of Wall Street. Do you regret that now?</p>
<p>McCAIN: No. I think the deregulation was probably helpful to the growth of our economy.</p></blockquote>
<p><object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vUJ_Qn0AHTU&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vUJ_Qn0AHTU&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>If you had any doubt as to how a McCain administration would handle the current financial crisis, the above quote is your answer. Incompetence and denial, denial, denial, denial.  McCain is a pure free-market ideologue.  He believes that the government should get out of the way and let the private sector regulate itself&#8230;.well it is that exact ideology that is directly responsible for the greatest collapse of the financial industry since the Depression.  To put the cherry on top, the McCain campaign refuses to rule out that Phil Gramm, architect of the deregulation bill that caused this crisis and referred to Americans as a &#8220;nation of whiners,&#8221;  will be the Treasury Secretary in a McCain administration.  Also, remember McCain&#8217;s plan, until last Friday, to privatize social security?  Imagine the state the nation&#8217;s social security program had we followed McCain&#8217;s advice and invested in stock market.  Thanks for everything Senator McCain but it is really time to turn the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/22/mccain-does-not-regret-his-vote-to-deregulate-wall-stare-you-kidding-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Republicans Fall out of Line after Palin pick&#8230;.turning on McCain-Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/19/conservative-republicans-fall-out-of-line-after-palin-pickturning-on-mccain-palin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/19/conservative-republicans-fall-out-of-line-after-palin-pickturning-on-mccain-palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[palin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mccain-palin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sarah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/19/conservative-republicans-fall-out-of-line-after-palin-pickturning-on-mccain-palin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Brooks writes in the New York Times that Sarah Palin is unqualified:
In the current Weekly Standard, Steven Hayward argues that the nation&#8217;s founders wanted uncertified citizens to hold the highest offices in the land. They did not believe in a separate class of professional executives. They wanted rough and rooted people like Palin.
I would have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Brooks <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/opinion/16brooks.html?_r=4&amp;ref=opinion&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin" title="writes">writes</a> in the <em>New York Times</em> that Sarah Palin is unqualified:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the current Weekly Standard, Steven Hayward argues that the nation&#8217;s founders wanted uncertified citizens to hold the highest offices in the land. They did not believe in a separate class of professional executives. They wanted rough and rooted people like Palin.</p>
<p>I would have more sympathy for this view if I hadn&#8217;t just lived through the last eight years. For if the Bush administration was anything, it was the anti-establishment attitude put into executive practice.</p>
<p>And the problem with this attitude is that, especially in his first term, it made Bush inept at governance. It turns out that governance, the creation and execution of policy, is hard. It requires acquired skills. Most of all, it requires prudence.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Sarah Palin has many virtues. If you wanted someone to destroy a corrupt establishment, she&#8217;d be your woman. But the constructive act of governance is another matter. She has not been engaged in national issues, does not have a repertoire of historic patterns and, like President Bush, she seems to compensate for her lack of experience with brashness and excessive decisiveness.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sen. Chuck Hagel <a target="_blank" href="http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2835&amp;u_sid=10435997" title="said to the">said to the </a><em>Omaha World-Herald</em> </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;But I do think in a world that is so complicated, so interconnected and so combustible, you really got to have some people in charge that have some sense of the bigger scope of the world,&#8221; Hagel said. &#8220;I think that&#8217;s just a requirement.&#8221; </p>
<p>So is Palin qualified to be president?</p>
<p>&#8220;I think it&#8217;s a stretch to, in any way, to say that she&#8217;s got the experience to be president of the United States,&#8221; Hagel said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ross Douthat <a target="_blank" href="http://rossdouthat.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/sarah_the_unready.php" title="agrees">agrees</a> at the <em>Atlantic</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Now that we&#8217;ve seen the entirety of the Palin-Gibson tete-a-tete, I concur with Rich Lowry and Rod Dreher. The most that can be said in her defense is that she kept her cool and avoided any brutal gaffes; other than that, she seemed about an inch deep on every issue outside her comfort zone. Yes, the questions were tougher than the ones that a Tim Kaine or Tim Pawlenty probably would have been handed, but they were all questions that a vice-presidential nominee needs to be able to answer. And there&#8217;s no way to look at her performance as anything save supporting evidence for the non-hysterical critique of her candidacy - that it&#8217;s just too much, too soon - and a splash of cold water for those of us with high hopes for her future on the national stage.</p></blockquote>
<p>And in the <em>Washington Post</em>, Richard Cohen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/15/AR2008091502406.html" title="lets loose">lets loose</a> on McCain:</p>
<blockquote><p>McCain has turned ugly. His dishonesty would be unacceptable in any politician, but McCain has always set his own bar higher than most. He has contempt for most of his colleagues for that very reason: They lie. He tells the truth. He internalizes the code of the McCains &#8212; his grandfather, his father: both admirals of the shining sea. He serves his country differently, that&#8217;s all &#8212; but just as honorably. No more, though&#8230;.</p>
<p>His opportunistic and irresponsible choice of Sarah Palin as his political heir &#8212; the person in whose hands he would leave the country &#8212; is a form of personal treason, a betrayal of all he once stood for. Palin, no matter what her other attributes, is shockingly unprepared to become president. McCain knows that. He means to win, which is all right; he means to win at all costs, which is not.</p></blockquote>
<p>In the <em>Weekly</em> <em>Standard, </em>Steven Hayward</p>
<blockquote><p>In the current Weekly Standard, conservative Steven Hayward argues that the nation’s founders wanted uncertified citizens to hold the highest offices in the land. They did not believe in a separate class of professional executives. They wanted rough and rooted people like Sarah Palin.</p>
<p>I would have more sympathy for this view if I hadn’t just lived through the last eight years. For if the Bush administration was anything, it was the anti-establishment attitude put into executive practice.</p>
<p>And the problem with this attitude is that, especially in his first term, it made Bush inept at governance. It turns out that governance, the creation and execution of policy, is hard. It requires acquired skills. Most of all, it requires prudence.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/19/conservative-republicans-fall-out-of-line-after-palin-pickturning-on-mccain-palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carly Fiorina:  McCain or Palin could not run a corporation</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/17/carly-fiorina-mccain-or-palin-could-not-run-a-corporation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/17/carly-fiorina-mccain-or-palin-could-not-run-a-corporation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[carly]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fiorina]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[response]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/17/carly-fiorina-mccain-or-palin-could-not-run-a-corporation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John McCain&#8217;s primary surrogate on all things economy Carly Fiorina said yesterday that Sarah Palin does not have the experience to run a company.  And, as if that wasn&#8217;t bad enough, she then went on MSNBC and said that her candidate, John McCain, does not have the experience to run a corporation.  If McCain&#8217;s own [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John McCain&#8217;s primary surrogate on all things economy Carly Fiorina said yesterday that Sarah Palin does not have the experience to run a company.  And, as if that wasn&#8217;t bad enough, she then went on MSNBC and said that her candidate, John McCain, does not have the experience to run a corporation.  If McCain&#8217;s own economic advisor says that he cannot run a corporation, how does McCain expect the American people to believe that he can, especially when he has admitted that he &#8220;doesn&#8217;t understand the economy.&#8221;.  The Obama campaign released the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;If John McCain&#8217;s top economic advisor doesn&#8217;t think he can run a corporation, how on Earth can he run the largest economy in the world in the midst of a financial crisis? Apparently even the people who run his campaign agree that the economy is an issue John McCain doesn&#8217;t understand as well as he should,&#8221; said Obama campaign spokesman Tommy Vietor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/17/carly-fiorina-mccain-or-palin-could-not-run-a-corporation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phil Gramm (future McCain Administration Treasury Secretary?), the man behind this economic meltdown</title>
		<link>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/16/possible-future-mccain-administration-treasury-secretary-phil-gramm-the-man-behind-the-this-economic-meltdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/16/possible-future-mccain-administration-treasury-secretary-phil-gramm-the-man-behind-the-this-economic-meltdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jai2</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gramm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[phil]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[street]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/16/possible-future-mccain-administration-treasury-secretary-phil-gramm-the-man-behind-the-this-economic-meltdown/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is former Senator and McCain economic advisor Phil Gramm who is primarily responsible for the law that caused this economic meltdown.  Chair of the Senate Banking Committee at the time and acting under cover of darkness, then Sen. Phil Gramm pushed through a bill titled the Commodity Futures Modernization Act (CFMA).  Gramm did so right after [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is former Senator and McCain economic advisor Phil Gramm who is primarily responsible for the law that caused this economic meltdown.  Chair of the Senate Banking Committee at the time and acting under cover of darkness, then Sen. Phil Gramm pushed through a bill titled the Commodity Futures Modernization Act (CFMA).  Gramm did so right after the <em>Bush v. Gore </em>decision in 2000 when only financial industry lobbyists were paying attention in Washington.  Then Senator Gramm and the REPUBLICAN CONTROLLED CONGRESS secretly slid through the CFMA.  The bill deregulated swaps which is the primary reason for the biggest financial meltdown since the Depression.  Yes, it is the deregulated swaps and lack of oversight that are &#8220;at the heart of the subprime meltdown&#8221; according to Michael Greenberger, former director of the Commodities Futures Traders Commission division of trading and markets in the late 1990s.  Sen. McCain is a strong proponent of deregulation of the nation&#8217;s financial markets and it was that deregulation and &#8220;the smartest person [McCain] knows,&#8221; Phil Gramm, that is primarily responsible for this crisis.  Gramm, then Chairman of the Senate banking committee, routinely turned down SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt&#8217;s request for more funds to police the financial industry.  McCain now claims that he plans to clean up Wall Street but until yesterday the Arizona senator stood firmly behind the policies, (deregulation) that put Wall Street in its current state.  Gramm&#8217;s recklessness in the financial industry has not dulled his glow in McCain&#8217;s eyes.  Dubbed an &#8220;economic guru&#8221; by Sen. McCain, Gramm is still closely connected to the campaign. If McCain gets in the White House, you can bet that Phil Gramm policies will be the driving force in the financial industry.  The two senators have been close friends since they served together in the House in the 1980s.  McCain chaired Gramm&#8217;s failure of a presidential campaign and Gramm was McCain&#8217;s formal senior economic advisor until six weeks ago when he called America and its people &#8220;a nation of whiners.&#8221;  McCain&#8217;s entire presidential campaign staff is comprised of people like Gramm.  How can someone who admits to &#8220;not understand the economy&#8221; and surrounds himself with the very people who caused this problem in the first place possibly represent reform or bring reform for that matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.progresspolitics.com/2008/09/16/possible-future-mccain-administration-treasury-secretary-phil-gramm-the-man-behind-the-this-economic-meltdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
