Archive for the 'Senate' category

Baucus plan should be called the “Insurance Industry Profit Protection and Enhancement Act”

This is what whistleblower and former top executive at Cigna, Wendell Potter, said about the health reform plan released by Sen. Baucus.  Potter said during the House Democratic Steering & Policy Cmte. forum yesterday that if the health care reform bill “fails to create a public insurance option to compete with private insurers, the bill it sends to the president might as well be called the Insurance Industry Profit Protection and Enhancement Act.”   He also went further and said the Baucus proposal is a joke:

“The Baucus framework is just an absolute joke,” said Potter, Cigna’s former head of corporate communications who has been speaking out against insurance industry practices. “It is an absolute gift to the industry. And if that is what we see in the legislation, (America’s Health Insurance Plans chief) Karen Ignagni will surely get a huge bonus.”

Potter went further:

Potter said the proposal would not provide affordable coverage. It gives the industry too much latitude to charge higher premiums based on age and geographic location, fails to mandate employer coverage, and pushes consumers into plans with limited benefits, Potter said.

Private insurers “want to have ‘benefit design flexibility.’ Those are three very worrisome words,” Potter said at a briefing arranged by the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank. “By being able to have benefit design flexibility, they will be able to design plans that are so limited that more and more people will be in the ranks of the uninsured.”

As for Baucus’ fellow Gang of Six members:

Sen. Jay Rockefeller blasted the draft bill produced by Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus: “there is no way in its present form that I vote for it unless it changes in the amendment process by vast amounts.”

He’s not alone.  Fellow Finance Committee member Ron Wyden is livid too.

Apparently Baucus sought the approval of special interest groups before giving his draft plan to his fellow colleagues.  The Senator has received significant contributions from the health care industry. See the comments about the release of the Baucus plan by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs:

GIBBS: I was told that — that K Street had a copy of the Baucus plan, meaning, not surprisingly, the special interests have gotten a copy of the plan that I understand was given to committee members today.

…………………….

GIBBS: I was told that — that K Street had a copy of the Baucus plan, meaning, not surprisingly, the special interests have gotten a copy of the plan that I understand was given to committee members today.

Sen. Max Baucus has chosen the insurance industry over the American people and therefore has lost all credibility in this debate.

Are you Serious Baucus??? Sotomayor really???

Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) said Thursday he hasn’t made up his mind on whether he will vote to confirm Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor.

Baucus this summer has infuriated liberals on and off Capitol Hill by working to strike a deal with Republicans on healthcare reform. A “no” vote on Sotomayor would be adding fuel to the left’s fire at the Finance Committee chairman.

Baucus on Thursday twice told The Hill he is undecided on next week’s floor vote on Sotomayor.

“I have no idea,” Baucus said. “I haven’t paid any attention and I haven’t announced … I’ve been so busy with healthcare. It’s under consideration. I’ll certainly know when I vote, but right now I can’t tell you.”

Bupkis from Baucus

Sen. Max Baucus has shown his true colors by successfully proposing a health care bill that eliminates the public option and rewards his insurance industry and GOP buddies.  So even though the American people roundly support a public option, President Obama wants a public option, and the majority of the Democrats in the Senate and the House want a public option, Baucus thumbs his nose at the will of the nation, the Executive, and the two chambers in his quest for bipartisan support and his desire to appease the insurance industry.  We voted last November for the Democratic agenda…IMPLEMENT IT!

The following is food for thought for Baucus and Conrad before they make their final decision.

Sen. Baucus, Sen. Conrad, and Sen. Nelson did you by chance read about the 2700 people who showed up as Wise County Fairgrounds in Wise, Virginia this week in hopes of receiving life saving medical treatment that they could not afford otherwise?  The scene is being compared to that of a Third World country.  American citizens slept in tents and beds of pick-up trucks for two days just to make sure that they received much needed treatment.  Baucus, Conrad, and Nelson how do you think these folks feel about achieving bipartisan support at the expense of strong and effective health care reform?  Is compromise more important than effectively tackling an issue that have plagued our nation and our people for generations?   People traveled from several states in hopes of obtaining medical treatment that they have been unable to receive due to lack of insurance, underinsurance, or unaffordable copays.  What is the problem Sen. Baucus?  See full story here.

Further, 72% of Americans want a public option.  Who exactly do you represent?

It turns out that Baucus wants bipartisan support so bad that he may be willing to repeal the SCHIP expansion and deny 11 million children health care.  Unbelievable!

But some liberal Democrats, like Senators John D. Rockefeller IV of West Virginia and Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, expressed reservations about concessions being made by Democrats to keep a few Republicans on board.

Mr. Rockefeller said he was unhappy that the legislation would end the Children’s Health Insurance Program and could reduce the scope of benefits for 11 million children in the program.

Asked if he would support the bill, Mr. Rockefeller shot back a somber, stony look. “Can’t you see the joy on my face?” he asked.

Sen. Baucus can be reached at (202) 224-2651 or baucus.senate.gov/contact/emailForm.cfm?subj=issue

Sen. Conrad can be reached at (202) 224-2043 or conrad.senate.gov/contact/webform.cfm 

Sen. Nelson can be reached at (202) 224-6551 or http://bennelson.senate.gov/email-issues.cfm

When Sen. Chuck Grassley (ranking GOP member in Senate Finance Committee) with all smiles beams that we are close to agreement it should be a red flag to Democrats and is likely a bad sign for proponents of TRUE health care reform.  Baucus and Grassley have been holding secret meetings behind closed doors to draft their plan.  Considering how Grassley receives a wealth of contributions from the insurance industry, as does Baucus, Democrats should be very concerned about their final product.

Norm Coleman Finally CONCEDES!!!!! Congratulations Al Franken!!!

Finally, after the Supreme Court of Minnesota ruled five to zero in favor of Al Franken, Norm Colman has accepted the ruling of the court.  “I will accept the the court’s decision.”  Coleman also said that he would not pursue any additional legal challenges and has already called and congratulated Al Franken on his win of the United States senate seat.  This will give the Democrats the magic 60 super majority in the Senate.

ST. PAUL, Minn. — The Minnesota Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered that Democrat Al Franken be certified as the winner of the state’s long-running Senate race.

The high court rejected a legal challenge from Republican Norm Coleman, whose options for regaining the Senate seat are dwindling.

Justices said Franken is entitled to the election certificate he needs to assume office. With Franken and the usual backing of two independents, Democrats will have a big enough majority to overcome Republican filibusters.

Senate officially Apologizes to African-Americans for slavery…..with a Caveat

The United States Senate officially apologized Thursday for the enslavement and segregation of millions of African-Americans and “the fundamental injustice, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery and Jim Crow laws.”  The body passed the resolution sponsored by Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa by way of voice vote.  The resolution now goes to the House of Representatives. 

One small point of contention.  The Congressional Black Caucus may not endorse the resolution due to the inclusion of a sentence that reads  ”nothing in this resolution authorizes or supports any claim against the United States; or serves as a settlement of any claim against the United States.”   A few members of the CBC have voiced concerns regarding the inclusion of  such “restrictive” additional language.

One  member of the CBC noted that the 1988 government apology issued to Japanese-Americans held in internment camps during World War II did not have a disclaimer nor did it include any language preventing them from receiving compensation.  Other CBC members said the following:

“Putting in a disclaimer takes away from the meaning of an apology,” said Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss. “A number of us are prepared to vote against it in its present form. There are several members of the Progressive Caucus who feel the same way.”

“The language is unacceptable,” said Rep. William Lacy Clay, D-Mo., “I’m a reparations man – how else do you repair the damage?”

UPDATE: Credit Card Bill of Rights Vote TODAY! Senate Passes bill 90-5!!!

The Credit Card Bill of Rights bill is up for vote today by the Senate.  This bill will, among many other things, prevent credit card companies from increasing interest rates four-fold without notice or justification.  Here are a few things to think about while you’re calling your Senator.

- People who have ALWAYS paid their credit card debt 100% on-time are now seeing
 their standard interest rates raised from 7.5% (avg) to 27% or more.

- Even debit cards, which have always been billed as “same as cash”, are seeing new fees added on by banks and card companies. 

- The average credit card debt for American households is $10,000.00.

- 80,000 new credit cards were solicited last year, many to students and people  
 without ongoing employment security.

Call your Senator and tell him to vote for this bill.

UPDATE:  The bill is on its way back to the House and should be signed into law by the end of the week depending on the President’s schedule.  Woohoo!  The bill gives credit card companies nine months to comply with the new rules.  Such companies will be required to post all agreements online and allow consumers to make payments via phone or Internet free of charge.  In addition, lenders must provide consumers with a 45-day notice and an explanation before increasing interest rates.  Good job everyone for reaching out to your Senators……90-5 WOW!!!!

Labor Unions target Specter about EFCA

Specter STRIPPED of ALL His Seniority…….Admitted to the DEmocrat side as a Freshman MEmber!

I guess all the trash talking Sen. Arnel Specter has been doing, “I will not be a loyal Democrat,” “I will not back the Employee Free Choice Act,”  “I will not be an automatic 60th vote” “still time for the Minnesota courts to do justice and declare Norm Coleman the winner,”  has had an effect on Senate Democrats. Last night in a modified resolution approved on the Senate floor it was resolved that Sen. Specter would enter the Democrat caucus as the most junior member of all committees but one.  Yes, Specter will be second in seniority only on the Special Committee on Aging despite promises from Sen. Harry Reid that the former Republican senator would retain the same seniority he would have earned had he entered the Senate as a Democrat 29 years ago.  As a Republican, Specter was the ranking member on the Judiciary Committee and a senior member of the Appropriations Committee, as well as ranking member of the panel’s Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education.  In fact, Specter lost seniority on five committees in all which will severly limit his influence.  So even though Specter retains seniority in the Senate generally he has lost it where it counts. 

Perhaps now the Pennsylvania Senator will realize that he has switched parties and there are consequences for Senators who switch parties in name only.  Specter’s comment that he is “entitled” to seniority this past weekend baffles this writer.  My question to Specter is have you been fighting for democratic causes for the 29 years that you have been in the Senate?  Voting with Democrats a mere 35 percent of the time does not “entitle” you to leap frog over those Senate Democrats who vote Democrat 80 to 90 percent of the time.  You’re not that valuable.  Not to mention the fact that you have benefited greatly throughout the past 29 years as a Republican member of the Senate primarly because the GOP has controlled the body for the majority of that time.  Senate Democrats have been in the minority for a long time, it seems unfair that all you need to do to usurp their earned power and influence is to cross to the other side of the isle.  Especially because you switched, by your own admission,  simply because you are unelectable as a member of the Republican party and not for any real ideological shift. 

It is unclear whether Sen. Specter will recoup his seniority IF he is reelected.

Happy 60th Mr. President

Most will be celebrating President Barack Obama’s 100th day in office today but some Democrats believe that the celebration for this milestone began yesterday when Sen. Arlen Specter delivered him a blue iced cake by announcing that he would be switching his party affiliation from Republican to Democrat.  The change will provide Senate democrats with a 60-vote filibuster-proof majority once Al Franken of Minnesota is seated.  Specter did caution democrats yesterday that they should not expect him to be an “automatic 60th vote” nor should they expect his vote on the current version of the Employee Free Choice Act.  The soon to be former Republican in fact reiterated his opposition to EFCA by saying that it was “a bad bill.”  However, it does not mean that he would not support the bill if it was tweaked a bit considering that he has supported it in the past. 

Sen. Specter began his political career back in the 60′s as a Democrat but switched to the Republican party in the 70′s.  As for Specter’s voting record, the Pennsylvania Senator voted with the Republican party 65 percent of the time this year.  While two other moderate Republicans senators Olympia Snow and Susan Collins of Maine only voted with their party 54 percent and 59 percent of the time respectively.  Democrats should not be overly excited about Specter’s switch and should remember that he voted AGAINST the Democrats 65 percent of the time and WITH the Democrats a mere 35 percent of the time.  The term that comes to mind is “Conservadem.” Democrats may be able to count on Specter for healthcare reform and probably climate change legislation but they had his support on those two issues prior to the switch.

The move by Specter is more devastating for the Republican party because it demonstrates the decreasing size of the Republican tent in terms of tolerable views outside those of the far, far, conservative right.  Specter in fact joined the other 200,000 Pennsylvanian Republicans who switched to the Democratic party within the last year.  Diversity of ideas or thoughts appears to be a deal breaker and as a result is the cost of admission and acceptance to the GOP.  Specter said yesterday that the reason he switched is because he did not want the far right electorate making the senatorial candidate decision for the entire state of Pennsylvania by supporting a right wing potential Republican candidate (Pat Toomey of Club For Growth fame) that planned to challenge him in the 2010 Pennsylvania primary.  Pat Buchannan said it best yesterday, the GOP is  “a heavily white party.”  This writer will add to that statement that the Republican Party is turning into a right wing fringe, isolationist sect incapable of offering credible and reasonable opposition.

As a side note:  Specter has built up a $6 million dollar campaign war chest as a Republican party candidate and has said in a statement released yesterday that he will return any donations made prior to the announcement upon request.

The President and Vice President will hold a press conference with Sen. Arlen Specter this morning welcoming Specter to the Democratic Party.

The MOST and LEAST bipartisan members of the SENATE

Who are the hardest and easiest Senators to persuade to cross the aisle?  The Hill asked all 99 Senators who of their colleagues was easiest to support a bipartisan bill and who is least likely to support a bill coming from the other side.  Below are its findings.

MOST BIPARTISAN

DEMOCRATS
1. Edward Kennedy (Mass.)
2. Tom Carper (Del.)
3. Chris Dodd (Conn.)
4. (tied) Evan Bayh (Ind.)
4. (tied) Tom Harkin (Iowa)

REPUBLICANS
1. Susan Collins (Maine)
2. Olympia Snowe (Maine)
3. Orrin Hatch (Utah)
4. (tied) Richard Lugar (Ind.)
4. (tied) John McCain (Ariz.)

LEAST BIPARTISAN

DEMOCRATS
1. Patrick Leahy (Vt.)
2. Charles Schumer (N.Y.)
3. Chris Dodd (Conn.)
4. Dick Durbin (Ill.)
5. John Kerry (Mass.)

REPUBLICANS
1. Jim Bunning (Ky.)
2. David Vitter (La.)
3. Tom Coburn (Okla.)
4. Jim DeMint (S.C.)
5. Lamar Alexander (Tenn.)

Tired of Credit Card Companies hiking up your Interest rates for no reason? Call your Senator…..the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights up for a Vote

If you are angry at how the banking industry has responded to the recession and your tax dollar bailout now is the time to act.  Credit card executives are meeting with President Obama today in an effort to try and persuade him not to support the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights currently in route to the Senate.   

As thanks to taxpayers for the billions of dollars in bailout funds, the banking/credit card industry has continued to engage in the unscrupulous practice of arbitrary interest rate hikes and increased fees without justification as well as other abusive practices.  The industry is heavily lobbying to kill the consumer protection bill or at least weaken it substantially.  The Washington Post is reporting that credit card companies have used $10 million dollars of the bailout/TARP money to lobby Congress and the White House.  This is a consumer protection bill that prevents the credit card industry from engaging in unfair practices simply because they can. The bill will in essence set guidelines that regulate the industry and protect the consumers.

The House Financial Services Committee has passed the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights and it’s on its way to the Senate.  If you are tired of being held hostage by credit card companies that consistently and unjustifiably raise interest rates in addition to other deceptive practices call both your Senator and Congressman today and let them know that you support this bill in its current form or a stronger version of it.

The following reforms are listed in the bill:

  • Ends Unfair, Arbitrary Interest Rates increases
  • Lets Consumers Set Hard Credit limits ” Stops excessive “over-the-limit” fees
  • Ends Unfair Penalties for Cardholders Who pay on time
  • Requires Fair allocation of Consumer Payments between Low interest Rate balances and High interest rate balances
  • Protects Cardholders from Due Date Gimmicks
  • Prevents Companies from using Misleading Terms and damaging Consumers’ Credit Ratings
  • Protects Vulnerable Consumers from High-Fee subprime Credit Cards
  • Bars issuing Credit cards from Vulnerable minors
  • Swift Implementation of Provisions 
  • Get more details about this Bill here

The author of bill H.R. 627, Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-NY), released the following statements yesterday:

“This landmark legislation helps level the playing field between cardholders and card companies. For too long the relationship has been one-sided; but markets function best when all sides know what they’re getting into– and these deceptive practices need to be stopped. The Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights brings more transparency to the contractual relationship and give consumers the tools they need to responsibly manage their own credit,” Maloney said.

“While today’s vote clears a major hurdle, credit card reformers are not out of the woods yet. With the continued support of Speaker Pelosi, I’m certain the House will pass the bill again– as it did last fall– and then we will work with Senator Dodd and other Senate supporters to get the 60 votes needed to overcome resistance in the Senate to helping consumers and get these provisions to the President’s desk before the summer.

The following statement was released by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi yesterday:

“The Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights protects Americans against the unfair and often abusive practices of credit card companies. Americans should never be subject to excessive credit card fees, sky-high interest rates, and unfair, incomprehensible agreements that credit card companies revise at will. But during a recession, with so many families in economic peril, these practices can be devastating.

“This legislation is a departure from an era of government indifference to anti-consumer practices. I commend Congresswoman

Carolyn Maloney for her tenacious work on this legislation in the face of continued opposition from corporate interests. I look forward to a strong, bipartisan vote in favor of the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights and to working with the Senate to send this critical pro-consumer legislation to President Obama for his signature into law.”

Is the GOP the party of NO alternatives? Lets examine the GOP counter arguments to the president’s Budget

It is very easy for someone to say that a plan will not work and criticize it excessively.  It is much more difficult to offer sound alternative solutions in the light of such criticism.  Every time I hear the President speak I walk away feeling completely confident of our eventual recovery.  So I pull up my bootstraps and head out to do my part by using a small amount of purchasing power to help in the cause.  Just as I’m about to head for the door, I hear someone from the GOP screaming ‘oh my goodness…..the sky is falling….the sky is falling.’  So what do I do instead….I go out and buy an umbrella. 

The GOP has been all over the Sunday shows and the political spectrum shouting that the budget proposed by President Obama spends too much and will impose insurmountable debt on future generations.  Such an argument confuses the immediate priorities.  Who amongst us would forgo an opportunity to provide our starving child with food knowing that it will result in a larger credit card bill next month even if there was a possibility that the grocer may not accept credit and you may walk away empty handed.  In times of emergency all reasonably viable opportunities must be pursued.  Besides, give a child a fish and he/she will eat for a day. Teach a child to fish and he/she will eat for a lifetime. It is a much better proposition to sacrifice the funds now and clean up the ocean so that future generations can eat for a lifetime.

Unfortunately, the GOP have failed miserably at offering any plausible alternatives to the president’s budget that have not already been tried during the eight years of the Bush administration.  In spite of the fact that the GOP has all of a sudden got fiscal religion, lets revisit history for a moment in terms of its fiscal track record.  The budget was balanced for the first time in 30 years under President Bill Clinton.  That means that the four Republican presidents preceding Clinton (Reagan, Bush 41, Nixon, Ford) and the single democratic president (Carter) could not balance the budget.  Lets also remember that President Bush and a republican controlled Congress entered office with a 86.4 billion dollar surplus.  President Bush, with the help of a GOP controlled Congress six out of his eight years in office, left the presidency and the country with a staggering $638 billion dollar deficit.  One wonders if on the Titanic the GOP were the ones bailing water into the ship. Needless to say, the Republican party has absolutely no credibility when it comes to debt left to future generations or fiscal discipline in general.

The President proposes that the best way to bring down our deficit is to have a budget that leads to broad economic growth. It also makes sense that the president’s budget is inseparable from our economic recovery because it lays the necessary foundation for a secure and lasting prosperity.  The administration plans to create a new foundation for the economy by creating a new health care system, new energy technology, and achieving great progress in education so that it will enable us to become a much stronger competitor in the global economy.  There is an enormous need to counter the incredible drop in demand currently plaguing the nation and pull us out of this crisis.  The only sector with money to do so is the government.  That means that the government is the liquidity source of last resort right now. It must spend to stimulate demand and prevent us from sinking into a depression. As a matter of fact, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a nonpartisan body, says that the adoption of the Reinvestment and Recovery Act will help to end the recession by fall of this year. 

We must make the necessary investments in education, health care, and renewable energy infrastructure now in order to equip future generations for future and sustained prosperity.  So instead of just putting a band-aid on the broken economy this administration has opted to confront it, operate, and heal it.  The biggest drain on future funds is health care.  More specifically, Medicare and Medicaid.  Therefore, investing in an information technology system to make the health care industry more efficient will also contribute significantly to decreasing our deficit. Now that all the relevant players in the health care industry now recognize that the industry must be reformed including the majority of the GOP, twelve years later, but at least they are on board now, now in the time to do it.  We must face the fact that we as a people must make a tectonic shift in how we move throughout or day to day lives.  During this challenging time it will be inconvenient and we will have to make sacrifices now in order to secure a prosperous future.

Other obstructionist arguments offered by the GOP.

 The GOP argues that the small businesses will be hurt most by a tax increase on Americans making over $250,000 a year.

According to Politifact, a small business would have to ”make” $250,000 in net profit after deducting all his expenses (employees pay, supplies, and other legitimate business expenses) to be subject to the tax increase.  The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center says that only two percent of small businesses will be subject to the tax increase.  Which means that 98 percent will more than likely receive a tax cut.

Charities will lose by a decrease in the deductions allowed for charitable giving by the wealthy.  There will be a cap on such deductions for those earning $250,000 or more a year.

The best way to encourage and enable charitable giving is to have a flourishing economy. When the economy is booming people are much more charitable. In addition, a significant amount of charitable giving comes from low income people through religious institutions etc.

Requires a Cap and Trade or energy tax on all Americans.  

The cap and trade plan is designed to reduce green house emissions and address climate change in addition to investing in necessary infrastructure building. Further, building such infrastructure will enable us to decrease our dependence on foreign oil.  The plan will also move toward providing us with alternative sources of energy and provide millions of green jobs in the process.  Not to mention that it will help us to become an energy producing rather than an energy consuming economy.  This part of the president’s budget is a necessary investment in our infrastructure, by way of updating the electric grid among other things, for the jobs of the future.  Our outdated electricity grid is costing the U.S. over $100 billion dollars a year.  It wastes twice as much energy as it did thirty years ago.  We need to update and modernize our energy grid.  The GOP has criticized this part of the budget by referring to it as an energy tax. Why you ask? Because the GOP is significantly dependent on oil company money and it is not in the interest of the oil industry for the U.S. to become less oil dependent.  Why you ask?  Because the cap and trade plan will result in consumers using less energy (driving less)which cuts into oil industry profits.

Repealing tax credits to the oil and gas industry that may result in putting the industry at a competitive disadvantage.

Exxon Mobil shatters U.S. records in January 2009 by reporting profits of 45.2 billion for 2008.   Nuff said.

Where is the GOP’s budget you ask? They don’t have one.