Archive for February, 2010

Reality Check from the President to the GOP

The President exposed just how disconnected the Republican party is from the average American in the following exchange with Sen. John Barasso:

Obama: “Would you be satisfied if every member of Congress just had catastrophic care – you think we’d be better health care purchasers?”

Barrasso: “I think actually we would … We’d really focus on it. We’d have more, as you say, skin in the game. And especially if they had a savings account – a health savings account – they could put their money into that, and they’d be spending the money out of that.”

Obama: “Would you feel the same way if you were making $40,000. Or if that was your income? Because that’s the reality for a lot of folks.”

Health Insurance Antitrust Exemption…..REPEAL IT!

One of the better Congressmen on the hill Rep. Tom Perriello (VA – 5th) is responsible for has proposed the passage of a simple two page bill that would remove the antitrust exemption that allows health insurance companies to collude and prevent competitors from entering the the health insurance market.  UPDATE:  The bill passed with a vote of 406-19.  CONGRATULATIONS Rep. Tom Perriello and Rep. Betsy Markey who are co-sponsors of this great bipartisan effort. 

So the moral of this story.  Even though the latest SCOTUS decision allows corporations to donate unlimited amounts of money to defeat a candidate, Perriello and Markey are choosing the interest of their constituents and the nationover the health insurance industry by sponsoring this bill.  No other industry except Major League Baseball enjoys such a free pass from anti-competition laws.  Having this exemption allows the health insurance industry to charge exhorbitant premiums to its customers and get away with it by blocking and sabotaging start-up insurance companies that would provide competition and colluding with other health insurance companies to fix premium prices.  In essence, the industry is allowed to legally price fix so that the consumer does not have the option of purchasing insurance elsewhere because all of the health insurance companies are alligned.  It is also allowed to create monopolies within states thereby preventing consumer choice.  In any other industry this is illegal because it prevents competition within the marketplace.  Lack of competition ALWAYS translates to higher prices for the consumer and disasterous customer service because there is not incentive to take care of the customer when you’re the only game in town.

The operative language in Perriello’s bill is as follows:

“Nothing contained in this Act shall modify, impair, or supercede the operation of any of the antitrust laws with respect to the business of health insurance.” 

The bill will “restore the application of the Federal antitrust laws to the business of health insurance to protect competition and consumers.”   Call your House member Senate member and tell him/her to support and vote for a Senate equivalent of the House bill HR 4626 The Health Insurance Fair Competition Act that will repeal the health insurance antitrust exemption and help bring accountability and competition to the health insurance industry.  Write your House Senate member here.

Also, without repeal of the health insurance antitrust exemption the EXCHANGE/S being proposed in the current health care reform bill is/are pretty much useless.  The health insurance industry will still be able to price fix and collude within the EXCHANGE thereby setting premium prices among themselves and preventing consumers from receiving real choice and competition.

I apologize for the hiccup with the site in the last 36 hours.  Major issues with host company.  This post is actually a day late due to administrative difficulties.

President Obama’s Health Care Reform Plan

An outline of the President’s health care plan:

From the White House Blog

The proposal will make health care more affordable, make health insurers more accountable, expand health coverage to all Americans, and make the health system sustainable, stabilizing family budgets, the Federal budget, and the economy: 

  • It makes insurance more affordable by providing the largest middle class tax cut for health care in history, reducing premium costs for tens of millions of families and small business owners who are priced out of coverage today.  This helps over 31 million Americans afford health care who do not get it today – and makes coverage more affordable for many more. 
  • It sets up a new competitive health insurance market giving tens of millions of Americans the exact same insurance choices that members of Congress will have.  
  • It brings greater accountability to health care by laying out commonsense rules of the road to keep premiums down and prevent insurance industry abuses and denial of care.  
  • It will end discrimination against Americans with pre-existing conditions.
  • It puts our budget and economy on a more stable path by reducing the deficit by $100 billion over the next ten years – and about $1 trillion over the second decade – by cutting government overspending and reining in waste, fraud and abuse.

In this writers opin

Credit Cardholders Bill of Rights Second Phase IN EFFECT TODAY!

New credit cardholder rules as affecting the consumer summarized by the Associated Press :

INTEREST RATES

THEN: Banks could raise the interest rate on an account at any time, including the rate on an existing balances, even if you weren’t late on payments.

NOW: The rate cannot be raised in the first year after an account is opened unless an introductory rate has come to an end. After that, cardholders must be notified 45 days in advance of any rate change.

For existing balances, rates can’t be raised unless the account is at least 60 days past due. If payments are made on time for six consecutive months, the original rate must be restored.

There’s still no cap on rates.

DISCLOSURES

THEN: The fine print on cardholder agreements was often difficult to understand. Rates, fees and penalties for other services such as cash advances, for example, could be hard to find. The impact of the interest rate on paying down a balance was hard to compute.

NOW: Cardholders will see how many months it will take to pay off a balance if only minimum payments are made. Statements will also indicate how much needs to be paid each month to pay off a balance within three years.

SERVICE FEES

THEN: Banks could charge as much as they wanted. They could assess annual fees, activation fees and other fees. This was mostly a problem for subprime cards marketed to those with poor credit scores. One popular card, for example, the Premier Bankcard, charged $256 in first-year fees for a $250 credit line.

NOW: Service fees, such as activation and annual fees, will be capped at 25 percent of the credit limit during the first year of use. After that, there is no cap.

GRACE PERIODS

THEN: Some card companies sent out statements not long before payments were due, and sometimes shifted payment due dates from month to month, meaning that payments would not always have enough time to arrive and get processed before being deemed late. As a result, some cardholders ended up getting charged interest or late fees even when they thought they were sending in payments on time.

NOW: The law requires that due dates remain consistent. Statements must be sent out 21 days before the payment due date, and finance charges and fees cannot be applied before that period is up. In practice, about half of card issuers have extended grace periods to as long as 25 days.

OVER-THE-LIMIT FEES

THEN: Banks set credit limits, then routinely allowed charges to exceed those limits. When that happened, though, the customer was charged an over-the-limit fee as high as $39. These fees were often triggered by interest charges or late-payment fees that pushed a balance over the credit limit. What’s more, multiple over-the-limit fees could get charged in a single billing cycle if the balance was paid down and another charge pushed the balance back over the limit.

NOW: The cardholder must specifically agree to permit transactions that exceed the credit limit. Only then can over-the-limit fees be charged. But the fees can’t be triggered by other fees or interest charges. Only one over-the-limit fee may be imposed during a billing cycle. No over-the-limit fees may be charged unless the cardholder has specifically agreed to permit transactions exceeding their authorized credit limit. These fees can no longer be triggered by other fees or interest charges imposed by the card issuer, and only one such fee may be imposed during a billing cycle.

In practice, several of the largest card companies have dropped these fees. Some banks are using pop-up boxes on their Web sites or other methods to obtain consumer authorization.

UNIVERSAL DEFAULT

THEN: If you made a late payment on one credit card or loan, or even late payments for obligations like utility bills, that could trigger interest rate hikes on other credit card accounts.

NOW: Card companies cannot raise interest rates on existing credit card balances. Interest rates can’t rise during the first year an account is open, unless the original agreement spelled out a promotional rate for a limited time.

Consumers with older accounts must be informed of any interest rate increase on new charges at least 45 days in advance. They must also be given a chance to opt out of the hike by canceling the account and paying down the balance at the old interest rate. If an interest rate is increased, the card company must review the account once every six months to assess whether the rate should be dropped.

STUDENTS

THEN: Students arriving on college campuses often confronted a gantlet of credit card marketers handing out T-shirts, pizza and other gifts in exchange for filling out card applications. Credit cards were frequently handed out without checking the applicant’s income sources. In 2008, 84 percent of undergraduates had at least one credit card. Average balances topped $3,100.

NOW: Credit cards may no longer be issued to anyone under age 21, unless the applicant has a co-signer, or can show independent means to repay the debt. Colleges must disclose any marketing deals they make with credit card companies. Banks are not allowed to hand out gifts on or near campuses or at college-related events.

Public Option still Most Popular

Public option more popular in key states than the Senate bill:

* In Nevada, only 34% support the Senate bill, while 56% support the public option.

* In Illinois, only 37% support the Senate bill, while 68% support the public option.

* In Washington State, only 38% support the Senate bill, while 65% support the public option.

* In Missouri, only 33% support the Senate bill, while 57% support the public option.

* In Virginia, only 36% support the Senate bill, while 61% support the public option.

* In Iowa, only 35% support the Senate bill, while 62% support the public option.

*In Minnesota, only 35% support the Senate bill, while 62% support the public option.

* In Colorado, only 32% support the Senate bill, while 58% support the public option. 

* In Nevada, only 34% support the Senate bill, while 56% support the public option.

* In Illinois, only 37% support the Senate bill, while 68% support the public option.

* In Washington State, only 38% support the Senate bill, while 65% support the public option.

* In Missouri, only 33% support the Senate bill, while 57% support the public option.

* In Virginia, only 36% support the Senate bill, while 61% support the public option.

* In Iowa, only 35% support the Senate bill, while 62% support the public option.

*In Minnesota, only 35% support the Senate bill, while 62% support the public option.

* In Colorado, only 32% support the Senate bill, while 58% support the public option.

Putting in a toothless regulator that changes in Washington whenever political control changes creates inconsistency and the likelihood that such regulator will become captured by the health insurance industry.  A public option is the best way to create competition and keep the health insurance companies in line.

Republican radio talk show host Michael Smerconish Switches to Independent

One Republican who is fed up with the Republican Party is long time conservative radio talk show host Michael Smerconish:

I’m not sure if I left the Republican Party or the party left me. All I know is that I no longer feel comfortable.

The national GOP is a party of exclusion and litmus tests, dominated on social issues by the religious right, with zero discernible outreach by the national party to anyone who doesn’t fit neatly within its parameters. Instead, the GOP has extended itself to its fringe while throwing under the bus long-standing members like New York Assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava, a McCain-Palin supporter in 2008 who told me she voted with her Republican leadership 90 percent of the time before running for Congress last fall.

Which is not to say I feel comfortable in the Democratic Party, either. Weeks before Indiana Democratic Sen. Evan Bayh’s announcement that he will not seek reelection, I noted the centrist former governor’s words to the Wall Street Journal‘s Gerald Seib. Too many Democrats, Bayh said in that interview, are “tone-deaf” to Americans’ belief that the party had “overreached rather than looking for consensus with moderates and independents.”

Where political parties once existed to create coalitions and win elections, now they seek to advance strict ideological agendas. In today’s terms, it’s hard to imagine the GOP tent once housing such disparate figures as conservative Barry Goldwater and liberal New Yorker Jacob Javits, while John Stennis of Mississippi and Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts coexisted as Democratic contemporaries.

At its annual convention held this past weekend the standard bearer of the Republican party CPAC had GLENN BECK as its keynote speaker for goodness sake!

President Obama Weekly Address: Prices, Premiums, Health Care – 2/20/09 (Video)

UPDATE: Senators For the Public Option through Reconciliation…How about yours?

The majority of Americans want a public option so why is the the Senate determined not to give the public what it wants?  Especially when it makes good fiscal sense, given the recent premium rate hikes of 39% CA and a proposed 54% in Michigan by Big Insurance, to do so?  Senators and House members should take note of Rep. Tom Perriello’s example.  Perriello is a Congressman in the very red fifth district in Virginia yet he voted his conscience when he voted in favor of including the public option in health care reform.  After doing so he stated that he is willing to lose an election in the name of  standing up for what he truly believes is best for his constituents and the nation.  The result?  At a time when many incumbents are retiring or are running a very weak reelection campaign Rep. Tom Perriello is tied or leading all the Republican candidates in his very red and conservative district.  As voters we want strong leaders who stand up for what they believe in and do not sway as a result of an election loss in a state thousands of miles away.  Voters do not vote for Democrats so that they will act like Republicans they vote for Republicans to be Republicans.  One Senator who should really take note of this is Sen. Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas.  When Arkansians want a Republican senator they will not reelect a pseudo Republican senator.  Therefore, pandering to the right does nothing more than expose such Senators as weak and willing to compromise their principles if it means getting reelected.  Think about it.

We need an effective method of cost control in the health care reform bill and requiring an 85 percent medical loss ratio is not enough because Big Insurance will develop a new way of defining medical care.  In other words, the insurance industry will find a way around the regulations similar to the way the credit card industry is doing to circumvent credit card company regulations.  The only effective method of cost control for Big Insurance is to provide a public option to compete with it head to head.

The Senators below have signed a letter to Leader Harry Reid requesting a vote on the public option through reconciliation:

Barbara Boxer (D-CA); Diane Feinstein (D-CA); Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ); Bar;bara Mikulski (D-MD); Jack Reed (D-RI); Bernie Sanders (I-VT); Chuck Schumer (D-NY) Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH); Tom Udall (D-NM); Michael Bennet (D-CO); Sherrod Brown (D-OH); Al Franken (D-MN); Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY); John Kerry (D-MA); Patrick Leahy (D-VT); Jeff Merkley (D-OR); Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI); Arlen Specter (D-PA); Sen. Tim Johnson (D-SD); Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ); Debbie Stabenow (D-MI); Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-HI); Dick Durbin (D-IL); Patty Murray (D-WA); Jeff Bingaman (D-NM); Amy Klobuchar (D-MN); Ben Cardin (D-MD); Ron Wyden (D-OR); Mark Udall (D-CO); Bob Casey (D-PA); Ted Kaufman (D-DE); Maria Cantwell (D-WA); Christopher Dodd (D-CT); Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-HI); Sen. Harry Reid(D- NV); Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT); Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND); Sen. Russell Feingold (D-WI); Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI); Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL)

The following Senators have not yet signed the letter….please call them and tell them to support the public option through reconciliation.  Senate phone numbers and contact info.

Sen. Daniel Akaka HI
Sen. Max Baucus MT
Sen. Evan Bayh IN
Sen. Mark Begich AK
Sen. Jeff Bingaman NM
Sen. Robert Byrd WV
Sen. Maria Cantwell WA
Sen. Ben Cardin MD (Supporter)
Sen. Thomas Carper DE
Sen. Robert Casey PA
Sen. Kent Conrad ND
Sen. Christopher Dodd CT
Sen. Byron Dorgan ND
Sen. Richard Durbin IL
Sen. Russell Feingold WI
(Supporter)
Sen. Kay Hagan NC
Sen. Tom Harkin IA
Sen. Daniel Inouye HI
Sen. Tim Johnson SD
Sen. Ted Kaufman DE
Sen. Amy Klobuchar MN
(Supporter)
Sen. Herb Kohl WI
Sen. Mary Landrieu LA
Sen. Carl Levin MI (Supporter)
Sen. Blanche Lincoln AR
Sen. Claire McCaskill MO
Sen. Robert Menendez NJ  
Sen. Patty Murray WA
Sen. Bill Nelson FL
Sen. Ben Nelson NE
Sen. Mark Pryor AR
Sen. Harry Reid NV
Sen. John Rockefeller WV
Sen. Arlen Specter PA
Sen. Debbie Stabenow MI
Sen. Jon Tester MT
Sen. Mark Udall CO
Sen. Mark Warner VA
Sen. James Webb VA
Sen. Ron Wyden OR

Plouffe is Back Baby! Take a look at what we found in our inbox from David Plouffe

Stimulus jobs graphic

A crisp clean graphic that defeats every claim by the GOP that the Recovery Act did’t create jobs.

GOP Hypocrisy Watch: Stimulus? What stimulus?

The GOP has been on parade in its opposition to the stimulus package passed a year ago but that didn’t stop Republicans from being first in line with their hand out.  Republican Senators and House members alike has their hands out while at the same time yelling to anyone who would listen how the stimulus did not create any jobs.  They did so while using such stimulus money to do what….create jobs in their districts and states.  One of its own called out the Republicans on its blatant hypocrisy yesterday.  Yes, the Rupert Murdoch owned conservative with a capital C Wall Street Journal listed some of the most egregious Republican offenders who have been begging for stimulus money while bashing it all over the airwaves.

More than a dozen Republican lawmakers supported stimulus-funding requests submitted to the Department of Labor, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Forest Service, in letters obtained by The Wall Street Journal through the Freedom of Information Act.

First up, Congressman Paul “wasteful spending spree” Ryan of Illinois:

Rep. Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican who called the stimulus a “wasteful spending spree” that “misses the mark on all counts,” wrote to Labor Secretary Hilda Solis in October in support of a grant application from a group in his district which, he said, “intends to place 1,000 workers in green jobs.” A spokeswoman for Mr. Ryan said the congressman felt it was his job to provide “the basic constituent service of lending his assistance for federal grant requests.”

Second, Representatives Sue Myrick (NC) and Jean Schmidt (OH):

Republican Reps. Sue Myrick of North Carolina and Jean Schmidt of Ohio sent letters in October asking for consideration of funding requests from local organizations training workers for energy-efficiency projects.

In November, Ms. Schmidt said in a statement, “It is time to recall the stimulus funds that have not been spent before the Chinese start charging us interest.”

Aaahh Sen. Cornyn of Texas:

The Environmental Protection Agency received two letters from Sen. John Cornyn of Texas asking for consideration of grants for clean diesel projects in San Antonio and Houston. Mr. Cornyn is the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

One of the letters was signed jointly with Republican Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, also of Texas. The letter said that the Port of Houston Authority “has informed me of the positive impact this grant will have in the region by serving as a foundation for PHA’s Clean Air Strategy Plan, creating jobs, and significantly reducing diesel emissions.” Houston received millions of dollars in diesel funding.

The agency also appeared to have received eight identical letters from Republican Sen. Bob Bennett of Utah recommending infrastructure projects in his state, seven of which were sent before stimulus legislation was passed by Congress.

You can read the full list of GOP hypocrites here.  ThinkProgress has a much longer list here.  Where’s the tea party at?

GOP Hypocrisy Watch: Military Tribunals or Federal Courts? National Security or Political calculation? The Facts and Results speak for themselves

Sixty-six percent of terrorists tried in military tribunals have been released.  Ninety percent of terrorist tried in federal courts have been convicted and remain behind bars.  Please explain to us the logic for trying terrorist in military tribunals as opposed to civilian courts?

Sen. Lindsey Graham went to Rahm Emmanuel last week attempting to obtain a compromise from the White House in which it agrees to try all terrorists in military commissions and he agrees to support the closure of Guantanamo. ?????????  We thought that decisions about where to hold trials were the Attorney General’s decision to make.  Further, this appears to be trap that hopefully the Obama administration will not fall for.  One terrorist released on this administration’s watch and the Republican party has its campaign issue for 2012. 

Funny how the outrage is conveniently directed at the current administration when the last administration tried three hundred terrorists in federal courts without so much as a peep from the Lindsey Grahams of the world.  All of sudden it is imperative that terrorists only be tried in military tribunals. Given the GOP’s track record for hypocrisy it would not be surprising to most that if Obama supported trying all terrorists in military commissions Republicans would be screaming that all terrorists must be tried in federal courts and trying them in military tribunals is jeopardizing our national security.

Terrorist trials conducted to date reveal that the federal court is a better forum and reaps better results.  Over 300 terrorists  were tried in federal courts and are still behind bars.  Three terrorists tried in the non Supreme Court tested, opponents argue that it is a violation of the Constitution to use military tribunals without a declaration of war,  military tribunals.  You see George W. Bush only received an Authorization for Use of Military Force from Congress not an actual “declaration of war.”  Simply calling it a “war” on terror for political gain does not count.  Again, three terrorists tried in non Supreme Court tested military tribunals two of which have been released.  Osama bin Laden’s driver got less than six years after being tried in a military tribunal.  Nuff Said.

Mr. Cheney: This is Why the Obama administration is taking Credit for Success in Iraq

Dick Cheney recently criticized Vice President Biden for giving credit to the Obama administration for withdrawing troops from Iraq and reallocating troops to Afghanistan or in essence taking credit for success in Iraq.  First, lets establish that the United States should never have gone to Iraq in the first place but thanks to you Mr. Cheney we are there.  This is YOUR mess sir, the current administration is just cleaning it up.  Now lets establish what success is in Iraq…getting out of Iraq as soon as possible and reallocating America’s resources to America for Americans.  Now that we have established some facts take a look at what Cheney said yesterday on This Week regarding the role of the Bush administration in the success of the Iraq troop withdrawal:

Cheney: “Its being done in accordance to the timetable that we initiated (??? the Iraqi Prime Minister initiated) that we inau..that we negotiated with a…with the Iraqis…I mean that was our policy.”

Really Mr. Cheney?  That was your policy?  We respectfully disagree.  In fact the Bush policy was exactly the opposite of  a timetable for withdrawal as evidenced by Bush  himself in 2008:

Bush Orders Halt in Iraq Withdrawals  4/2008:  The president said that only as conditions in Iraq improve will he bring more troops home, a policy he calls “return on success.”

Bush Emphasizes His Opposition to Timetable for Iraq Withdrawal  7/16/2008:  [Bush] reiterated his opposition to what he called “an artificial timetable for withdrawal.”

For those who see continuity between the Bush administration and the Obama administration on this issue it is because the Bush administration reactively changed its position at the tail end of 2008 due to a decision by Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki’s government and pressure from the American public then being informed and persuaded by presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama.  Candidate Obama campaigned on an Iraq timetable for American troop withdrawal from the genesis of his presidential campaign in 2007.  At such time, George W. Bush repeatedly railed against an ”artificial timetable for withdrawal”  and was intent on achieving “victory” before withdrawing troops. It was only when the Prime Minister of Iraq said that he endorsed a timetable for U.S withdrawal [then being advocated by Sen. Obama] that President Bush was forced to acquiesce to such a timetable three days after stating his strong opposition to the measure.

Bush, in a Shift, Accept concept of Iraq Timeline7/19/2008:   “Under pressure from political parties wanting a diminishing American role, Mr. Maliki began demanding something in the agreement that would make it clear that American troops were on the way out. Iraq’s statement on Friday, reflecting those internal sensitivities, referred more specifically than the American version to ‘a time frame for the complete transfer of the security responsibilities to the hands of the Iraqi security as preface to decrease the number of the American forces and withdraw them later from Iraq.’ ”

“It came on the eve of a trip to Iraq and Afghanistan by the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, Senator Barack Obama, who has vowed to pursue a strict phased timetable for withdrawing most combat troops from Iraq over 16 months beginning next year. He has cited Iraq’s eagerness for a timetable as support for his strategy.”

So Mr. Cheney, withdrawing from Iraq was not  the George W. Bush administration policy.  The Bush administration simply co-opted the policy of candidate Barack Obama.  In addition, it is the Obama administration that planned and is implementing the Iraq exit strategy from January 2009 to present day.  All the Bush administration did was make stole the announcement.  That dear sir is why the Obama administration deserves credit for withdrawing troops from Iraq and reallocating such resources to Afghanistan.

President Obama Weekly Address – Fiscal Responsibility and Pay-Go – 02/13/10 (Video)

One of the more Beautiful Aspects of Living in the Nation’s Capital during Snowmaggedon

GOP Hypocrisy Watch: The Myth of Bipartisanship and the Stimulus – Rachel Maddow Unplugged (Video)

DEMOCRATS! REPUBLICANS ARE NOT GOING TO WORK WITH YOU! Why should they work with DEmocrats when they can oppose every single beneficial bill then blatantly and hypocritically take credit for such bills at the same time. Not to mention admit in private that such bills are good policy. Republicans will not vote for any legislation proposed by the Democrats or this President because opposing both is good politics for their party regardless of the help such legislation would provide to the American people. So Move it along Democrats and pass the much needed jobs bill, health care reform, and financial regulatory reform and stop pursuing the myth of bipartisanship!

RANT: America Does not have time for Congress to take a Snow Day!

Okay some may disagree with this post but so be it.  We have had record snow fall in Washington, DC during the last week and people have seriously lost their minds.  But what really irritates me is that the House has cancelled all votes until next week.   HUh?????   Excuse me but if I can get myself to work each day in two feet of snow in Washington, DC so can Congress!  This is a work week and there is too much work to do for Congress to be taking a snow week.  We have spent a year discussing health care reform and almost as long discussing financial regulatory reform.  It is time to DO SOMETHING!  Just in case it slipped your mind Congress, Blue Cross raised its premium rates in California by a whopping 39 percent just this year!  Also, credit card companies are continually inventing ways to gouge consumers because no one is tending the till???  And most importantly, UNEMPLOYMENT IS AT 9.7 PERCENT!  The 2010 elections are fast approaching and the closer we get to such elections the less chance Congress has of passing any significant legislation. 

There is no reason why the House should have cancelled votes this week.  The Senate is in session therefore the House should also be in session.  It’s not like House member’s work requires that they be outside subjected to the elements, they’re inside an office building for goodness sake.  For those who complain that because they left for the weekend last weekend they could not get back to DC due to the snow we say if Senate members can make it back to DC  from their home states so can House members.  Besides how did members get out of DC last weekend during a snow storm?  Most of them should already be in the capital city.  The American people are hurting and it is up to Congress to work through the night every night  if they have to to accomplish what it needs to do to alleviate some of the hurt being felt.

With the Presidents Day recess the House will officially be out now for TWO WEEKS!  Un-FREAKIN-believable!

GOP Hypocrisy Watch: Photographic Proof Of the Disingenuousness of GOP deficit hounding

The next time you ask the question which party has left us with the largest deficits take a look at the charts below.

These numbers were caculated by the nonpartisan CBO office.  Remember the Bush tax cuts and the Prescription Drug bill?

Do you need more proof as to who if the fiscally responsible leader in teh current political environment?

President Obama Weekly Address: Help to Small Business – 02/06/10 (Video)

An apologetic former CitiCorp Chairman calls for financial regulation overhall

A remorseful John S. Reed, former Chairman and CEO of CitiCorp, appeared before the Senate Banking Committee yesterday as he called for full financial regulatory reform including a dedicated consumer-focused financial protection agency.  ”There seems to have been a key failure that none of us anticipated,” Reed said in a prepared statement at a Senate Banking Committee hearing, “namely, individual institutions which are thought to take steps and exercise judgments to insure their self-preservation turned out ‘not to have’ or been incapable of so doing.

The former Chairman and CEO went further:

In response to a question from Senator Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), who called Reed’s testimony “fascinating” given that he presided over Citigroup at a time when it was expanding in all these areas, Reed said it was exactly that experience that informs his view now.
“I learned a lot,” Reed said, joking that this may be the first time he has ever agreed with former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker on anything. “There’s no question that when we put Travelers and Citi together we created a monster.”

“My honest belief having experienced it…is that the system would be stronger if we could provide for some separation where major depositories are not major actors in the capital markets,” Reed said.

“This clearly means that in designing a robust system, we cannot count on that capacity.”  Mr. Reed decribed what the essential elements of financial regulatory reform must be below.

  • The capital held by financial firms to protect against potential losses “should be significantly increased, maybe doubled.” He added that he thinks the concept of “risk adjusted capital,” a complex system used by regulators to judge whether a bank has adequate cash, “is flawed.”
  • The industry should be “compartmentalized” to limit the spread of failures and to preserve “cultural boundaries.”
  • Traded products (to the extent possible) should flow through exchanges. Much of the derivatives market is currently in the dark, traded over the phone rather than through a centralized exchange where regulators could know what’s going on.  
  • A consumer-focused financial protection agency with a “clear and separate mandate” should be created.
  • Are you listening Sen. Dodd???

    Rep. Tom Perriello and Betsy Markey initiate REPEAL of health insurance Anti-trust exemption

    Congressman Tom Perriello (VA-5th) and Betsy Markey (CO-4th) will propose legislation next week stripping the health insurance industry of its anti-trust exemption.  Bravo Rep. Perriello and Markey for your continued fight on behalf of the American people.  See excerpt of press release below.

    The measure would end special treatment for the insurance industry that allows them to fix prices, collude with each other, and set their own markets without fear of being investigated. Removing this exemption has been a common priority of these two freshmen lawmakers, though they voted differently on the initial House health care reform bill.    

    “It’s time for Washington to decide whether we stand with patients or profiteering, whether we believe in market competition or a collusion between politicians and insurance monopolies. It’s time to end the monopoly protections that Washington has protected for decades as prices skyrocketed. It’s time for a simple, clean bill – no carve-outs or special deals – that forces insurance companies to compete. It’s time to put patients and cost relief first,” said Rep. Perriello. “Americans deserve to know who stands with them against the price gouging of middle-class and working-class folks. Today, we do.”

    “I’ve heard from tens of thousands of Coloradans across my district, and though people’s opinions may vary, the common message is clear: the current health care system is crushing our families and businesses,” said Rep. Markey. “Support for removing this unfair exemption cuts across party lines, and is a major piece of common ground that I’ve been working toward in our country’s health care debate. This is about bringing sorely-needed competition back into an industry that has for too long wielded monopoly control over hard-working American families.”

    This is why we send people to Washington, DC to focus on our interest and not their re-election.

    Italy does what OUR Congress will not: Italy seizes Bank of America assets

    Just because our Congress allows the banks to control our government does not mean that Europe will be doing the same.  Italy seized Bank of America assets for alleged derivatives fraud.  You know, the thing that was a major contributor to the financial meltdown in this country.   So instead of exhibiting alleged “outrage” at the fraud and corruption perpetrated by our banks Italy is doing something about it.

    Feb. 3 (Bloomberg) — Italy’s financial police are seizing 73.3 million euros ($102 million) of assets from Bank of America Corp. and a unit of Dexia SA as part of a probe into an alleged derivatives fraud in the region of Apulia.

    The police are sequestering a further 30 million euros that the municipality was set to place in a fund managed by the banks on Feb. 6, according to an e-mail from the prosecutor’s office in Bari today. The prosecutor also asked that Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America be banned from doing business with Italian municipalities for two years. A hearing is slated for next month.  Prosecutors allege that when the banks arranged swaps and created a fund that invests money the region set aside to repay 870 million euros of borrowings due in 2023, they misled the region about the economic advantage of the package. Banks skewed the swaps to their advantage to hide fees, the prosecutor said.

    Apulia, located in the heel of Italy, joins more than 519 municipalities that face 990 million euros in derivatives losses, according to data compiled by the Bank of Italy. In Milan, prosecutors seized assets from four banks including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and UBS AG and requested they stand trial for alleged fraud. Hearings started in Milan this month…

    Bank of America also just announced that it will be paying investment-banking employees $400,000, on average, per employee.  So instead of lending the TARP money to small businesses they are using it pay bonuses.  The blogger below captured the situation exactly.

    Crime does pay in the short term. Especially if you can buy off the government and co-op the regulators of a major developed nation…..

    People argue that if a nation sets rules for banks, they will just move offshore and keep doing business in any way that they please. This is intended to undermine any reforms and the rule of law. It is possible to ban a company from doing business in your nation if it engages in unlawful practices. As noted here previously, Citi was engaging in trading practices in Europe and Japan that put them on the receiving end of bans for fraud. Globalization is used as a rationale for stripping nations of their sovereign rights, and the people from their ability to rule and protect themselves in accord with their own beliefs and preferences.

    http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot…

    Sen. Chris Dodd mentioned yesterday that the President was too ambitious with his financial regulatory reform plans.  But our guess is that in light of Dodd’s pending and imminent departure from Congress he is currently setting up a lucrative retirement for himself post-Senate.  Ticking off his future employers by passing sweeping and effective financial regulatory form does not bode well for his future plans.  Just saying.

    Fiscal Responsibility and Debt Reduction under President Obama is not in the GOP’s INTEREST

    The President is a very smart man so we are sure that he realizes that the Republicans in the House and the Senate will never support any piece of legislation that will contribute to him succesfully putting the country back on track.  Why? Because Republican’s success depends on the country being in a ditch in 2010.  The success of policies proposed by this President or implemented under his watch means a decreased chance of the GOP regaining control of the House and Senate in 2010.  So the GOP will continue to block and obstruct anything proposed by the Democrats or this President.   This could not have been more apparent than when President Obama endorsed a debt commission in light of the GOP’s newly acquired obsession to the deficit.  The debt commission idea was originally proposed by Republican Senators who when it came to vote for the bill the seven GOP senators who proposed it changed their mind and voted against the measure at the last moment.  Why?  Because it may make the President look good.  This is how strongly the GOP feels about the defecit and reducing the debt.  In other words, “debt on the backs of our children” does not matter when it comes to becoming the majority in the House and the Senate.  The American people are secondary.  Pure and utter politics. 

    The next obstruction planned by the GOP?  Financial regulatory reform.  Notorious GOP pollster Frank Luntz recently wrote up a memo of how to do it.

    Nine months after he penned a memo laying out the arguments for health care legislation’s destruction, Republican message guru Frank Luntz has put together a playbook to help derail financial regulatory reform.

    In a 17-page memo titled, “The Language of Financial Reform,” Luntz urged opponents of reform to frame the final product as filled with bank bailouts, lobbyist loopholes, and additional layers of complicated government bureaucracy.

    This continued quest for bipartisanship is an exercise in futility that is a waste of taxpayer money.

    Fox News SERIOUSLY???????

    Am I living in an alternative universe or something?  How is it that FoxNews is the most trusted network by Americans.  Public Policy Polling asked 1,150 Americans  which of the five networks do they trust most?  The highest percentage of participants answered……Fox News!!!  This the the same network that pushes the meme that the President was not born in the United States.  Seriously????  The network that houses Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity??? The same network that deceptively edited footage of a tea party gathering to include footage from a prior more attended gathering so as to make it appear that the crowd was much larger than it actually was on the day in question.  Seriously??

    “49% of Americans say they trust Fox News to 37% who disagree,” the poll’s authors wrote. “Predictably there is a large party split on this with 74% of Republicans but only 30% of Democrats saying they trust the right leaning network.”

    “CNN does next best because it is the second most trusted of Democrats, Republicans, and independents. 39% say they trust it compared to 41% who do not, with 59% of Democrats, 33% of independents and 23% of Republicans saying it carries credibility with them.”

    This explains quite a bit.

    Question Time with the GOP – Historical